Quote from: EarnOnVictor on Today at 07:19:36 AM

Why not keep silent when you do not have anything reasonable to say? It's unreasonable because 1. You didn't consider the genesis of this and my vital points, and 2. You repeated what I said. Loyalty is a choice, no one is challenging anyone. I was just saying it based on that context (loyalty).

Also, don't preach self-righteousness to me, I've said it many times on the forum that almost all of us wearing signatures are doing it for the money. So don't tell me what I know. Nevertheless, loyalty comes in when even if you have the opportunity to earn more but refuse for one reason or another, especially if where you are aligns with your values and standards. We've seen people staying glued to a campaign with lower pay when they have the opportunity and qualifications to move to a higher pay one(s), especially if they love the manager. That is loyalty, if you don't know!

So, it is not about being paid or not that you are diverting it to, and neither is loyalty about breaking any rule or being a bad bad person, it is a choice, and no one is questioning anyone for the choice they make, but still, it doesn't stop the fact that they were not loyal.

I hope this has silenced your reply that wasn't called for? It's not all replies that are necessary.

Even though your post is not related to or directed at me, I would like to respond.

Bro, first of all, you need to ease your nerves and try to avoid getting extreme in discussions or arguments because that isn't good for one's health.

Secondly, this is a public forum; anything posted in here is available for everyone to read, observe, and give their opinion about because they have every right to do so, and it's not necessary for two or more people to have the same opinion on everything, and we should respect each other's opinions and respond accordingly even if we don't agree with something they are trying to say.

That being said, I don't understand how you are comparing forums with signature campaigns and using that as an example, knowing the fact that a person can join two or more forums simultaneously, but one can only join one signature campaign at a time. You may call someone disloyal if they leave one signature campaign for another only for a higher pay rate, and you wouldn't be wrong about that, but I don't agree that if someone is using two forums or is active in both of them, they are being disloyal to the forum that they started using first. That doesn't make much sense to me.

Bitcointalk has always been my favorite forum, and it will always be, for obvious reasons that I've explained in a post earlier, but that shouldn't restrict or limit me from using other forums available, and if I start using another forum along with Bitcointalk, for any reason, whether it's because mixers are not banned there, or I want to make more money from signature campaigns there that are being managed by the same managers we have in here, I don't think I deserve being labelled as disloyal to Bitcointalk just for that.

So, I respect your opinion, and I don't get mad at you only for that because it's what you think, but I don't agree with it, so let's just agree to disagree and not turn this discussion into an argument for no reason.