This is crazy. Provider says Value. XYes says value to first person. Then XYes risk team switches to Arb because they realize value isn’t illegal. It’s not right that you are screwing these players and trying to make it look as though the odds provider flagged for arb. It’s borderline lying on your part.
Edit- it’s not borderline, you’re lying. CLV doesn’t guarantee profit.
You might want to revise and perhaps retract that accusation of me lying after you read my edit for your edit-of-your-edit above. It should give you some clarification and grip of what happens here and and what happens there.
Edit for your edit [again]: ...... uhh... read.
You are lying. This rule doesn't exist
. A lot of those don't guarantee a profit. To summarize: no CLV, no value betting, no syndicate betting, no bot-betting or whatever-other-betting, specifically "arbitrage bet", and the provider risk team is the one that flag this.
No one steals for CLV. Every person that gets limited is for CLV or ROI.