From the top of my head, I gave you three chances to back down and to calm down and to digest the situation. I offered you to read and if perhaps you want to revise and retract your statement about me lying. I've gave enough chances to deescalate the matter. Yet you insist with me lying. So, let's escalate it. Let's put money where your logic and mouth and knowledges are.
Escrow 1 million USD... no, 1 point 56 million USD [yes, the 56 is the pun intended for the odds of the wager in this case], one million five hundred and sixty thousand USD, 1,560,000 USD to an escrow, then select a DT. I'll break my vow of silence to XYes and show the proof that was intended to be for my eyes only, that the instruction and the flag come from the provider [well, basically I am not violating their trust, as GoT is planning to ask for other reputable member anyway].
Give your words and we can settle it for good. Or... take my words that I said what I saw. And I'm an honest man. And fair.
The flag always comes from provider and it's either for CLV or ROI. You said the provider flagged for arbitrage. Did the provider flag for arbitrage? Are the rules you posted for CLV fake rules?
[/quote]
The flag is coming from the provider. It was them who warned the casino, just like they do with the other casinos. And no, not CLV or ROI, arbitrage bet. I've mention this many many times. Just escrow the fund and you'll get the confirmation from the DT.
And again, what rules do I post? I'm not a rule maker, I didn't post any rules. What on earth are you talking about? Now, I am saying this in a friendly tone to once again try to deescalate the matter [despite above paragraph, because I am serious with that]: calm down, breathe, ground yourself, 5-4-3-2-1 technique if that helps. You're hurting your own image by looking like someone frantic and spewing words that I didn't say. In other circumstances, people will consider this as you twisting words and making false statements to discredit someone else.