Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 3
Last scraped
Edited on 02/07/2025, 23:13:01 UTC
@holydarkness this is not about a proof that a warning was sent from Betby to XYes, this is about proof that there was arbitrage betting. For that you would need to have 2 bet slips, both with comparable stakes on the opposite outcomes of the same event. This is not do-able on the same bookmaker (because they have a bookie margin that makes it impossible to arb within the same book) so the 2nd betting slip would have to be from another book (for example Pinnacle) and it would be impossible for you nor XYes to have obtained this.
True, that’s the only way to prove arbitrage betting. He has no proof other than trying to show me another fake document. This whole thing is crazy. XYes doesn’t have the two bet slips. It’s impossible. Case should have been done in 5 seconds. Pay the players.

@holydarkness I don’t care about all that stuff you just posted. My concern is for the two players. Post the bet slips. You already said that XYes says their license is outdated. I don’t need to see more fake documents.

Quote
Now, about license. They told me that it was indeed an outdated one.
You should have known by the numbers it was fake. It was the wrong format but you believed the casino instead of the facts presented showing you it was the wrong format.

Version 2
Edited on 25/06/2025, 23:43:21 UTC
@holydarkness this is not about a proof that a warning was sent from Betby to XYes, this is about proof that there was arbitrage betting. For that you would need to have 2 bet slips, both with comparable stakes on the opposite outcomes of the same event. This is not do-able on the same bookmaker (because they have a bookie margin that makes it impossible to arb within the same book) so the 2nd betting slip would have to be from another book (for example Pinnacle) and it would be impossible for you nor XYes to have obtained this.
True, that’s the only way to prove arbitrage betting. He has no proof other than trying to show me another fake document. This whole thing is crazy. XYes doesn’t have the two bet slips. It’s impossible. Case should have been done in 5 seconds. Pay the players unless someone has 2 bet slips.

@holydarkness I don’t care about all that stuff you just posted. My concern is for the two players. Post the bet slips.

Version 1
Scraped on 25/06/2025, 23:18:07 UTC
@holydarkness this is not about a proof that a warning was sent from Betby to XYes, this is about proof that there was arbitrage betting. For that you would need to have 2 bet slips, both with comparable stakes on the opposite outcomes of the same event. This is not do-able on the same bookmaker (because they have a bookie margin that makes it impossible to arb within the same book) so the 2nd betting slip would have to be from another book (for example Pinnacle) and it would be impossible for you nor XYes to have obtained this.
True, that’s the only way to prove arbitrage betting. He has no proof other than trying to show me another fake document. This whole thing is crazy. XYes doesn’t have the two bet slips. Case should have been done in 5 seconds. Pay the players unless someone has 2 bet slips.

Original archived Re: XYES.COM SCAM
Scraped on 25/06/2025, 23:13:23 UTC
@holydarkness this is not about a proof that a warning was sent from Betby to XYes, this is about proof that there was arbitrage betting. For that you would need to have 2 bet slips, both with comparable stakes on the opposite outcomes of the same event. This is not do-able on the same bookmaker (because they have a bookie margin that makes it impossible to arb within the same book) so the 2nd betting slip would have to be from another book (for example Pinnacle) and it would be impossible for you nor XYes to have obtained this.
True, that’s the only way to prove arbitrage betting. He has no proof other than trying to show me another fake document. This whole thing is crazy. XYes doesn’t have the two bet slips. Case should have been done in 5 seconds.