In other words, you don't believe it because you have an immovable preconception that you won't let reality change.
How is it preconceived when I can clearly see and observe what I just said about AI-generated responses? Whether they are short or long, they will always be identical, and a person who has a general understanding of an AI tone would understand it as soon as they read it.
When you find out that there are people who instead of going to a psychologist use ChatGPT or that AI today diagnoses better than doctors, you might have a heart attack.
Lol, why would I have a heart attack for hearing about things that I know exist? I never said that AI in itself is a bad thing. I can never say that because I know it's a very useful technological advancement, and that it can help so many industries become much more powerful than they currently are in their future form, or even in their current form. I said this above, and I say it again, I don't have any problem with anyone using AI for anything they deem fit, be it for personal use or professional, as long as they give it credit.
What I'm against is people misusing the power of knowledge that they've got because of AI. People who didn't know sh*t about certain topics are now able to have long and lengthy discussions/arguments with the help of AI, but they don't do it openly, which means that they don't pass on the information that they are getting/generating from an AI as AI's, but they pretend to have that knowledge themselves, which is wrong.
Since this thread, and most of our discussions about AI around this forum, are only about its uses in the forum, I'm talking in that context and not about AI's usage in the world outside this forum.
On the other hand, if when you speak of “soul” you mean it in a religious sense I respect your beliefs but I think our basic ideas are too different to enter into debate.
I didn't say that in a religious sense because it wouldn't make any sense for me to bring religions or religious beliefs when discussing general AI-generated content. What I meant was that the tone of an AI-generated response will have some sort of a dull, robotic feel, and as I said above, it could be because of the words it uses, the pattern that it uses to form sentences, or maybe the perfection in grammar or punctuation. Whatever it is, it just doesn't feel like it's a reply from a human, and that's why I said above that I don't agree with you when you say that the short responses are indistinguishable to humans.
I hope I made myself clear.
