Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 28/06/2025, 13:39:46 UTC
The term 'gig' originated from musicians to refer to the performances they are paid to do. Gigs are typically short-term temporary jobs. Gig workers are usually paid not on contract but based on project done or sometimes by hourly work.

During the pandemic, the gig economy rose significantly. We saw an influx of gig workers since almost everyone was laid off from their jobs and had to find something to do remotely. Now, it has almost became the norm. The pros of being a gig worker is you control your time. You do not need to clock in or clock out. No need to leave the comfort of your own house. You have more flexibility as long as you meet the terms of the project.

But we can't forget about the cons as well. Gig workers are essentially both the employee and the employer. They provide their own material or equipment to be used for their jobs. They are the ones to take care of employee benefits like healthcare insurance. Legal expenses are also their burden. One of the biggest factors of being a gig worker is its instability. Unlike employees, you are not contracted for a long time. So if you fail to find a job for a certain amount of time, you will not be earning anything.

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?



Sounds like a nightmare for an HR person in any company. And such guys in the company where I worked were called "subcontractors". These are small organizations that consisted of not very qualified personnel who performed the tasks assigned to us and left.
As a rule, they worked very poorly and could not perform the tasks well, because of which I had to arrange frequent meetings with them, and I had to explain their mistakes to them. It was much easier to do the task myself.
I'm glad I don't have anything to do with them anymore.
Original archived Re: Gig workers — employees or employers?
Scraped on 28/06/2025, 13:34:59 UTC
The term 'gig' originated from musicians to refer to the performances they are paid to do. Gigs are typically short-term temporary jobs. Gig workers are usually paid not on contract but based on project done or sometimes by hourly work.

During the pandemic, the gig economy rose significantly. We saw an influx of gig workers since almost everyone was laid off from their jobs and had to find something to do remotely. Now, it has almost became the norm. The pros of being a gig worker is you control your time. You do not need to clock in or clock out. No need to leave the comfort of your own house. You have more flexibility as long as you meet the terms of the project.

But we can't forget about the cons as well. Gig workers are essentially both the employee and the employer. They provide their own material or equipment to be used for their jobs. They are the ones to take care of employee benefits like healthcare insurance. Legal expenses are also their burden. One of the biggest factors of being a gig worker is its instability. Unlike employees, you are not contracted for a long time. So if you fail to find a job for a certain amount of time, you will not be earning anything.

Is being a gig worker worth all the cons mentioned? or do you still find being a traditional employee more appealing?



Sounds like a nightmare for an HR person in any company. And such guys in the company where I worked were called "subcontractors". These are small organizations that consisted of not very qualified personnel who performed the tasks assigned to us and left.
As a rule, they worked very poorly and could not perform the tasks well, because of which I had to arrange frequent meetings with them, and I had to explain their mistakes to them. It was much easier to do the task myself