Quote from: Upgrade00 on Today at 10:16:41 AM

Quote from: shield132 on Today at 09:50:49 AM

The actual RTP of those Baccarat games aren't 1.06%, that's the house edge. If the RTP of those games was 1%, that means that the casino returns 1% of the money to the player and takes 99% itself, which is hugely unattractive. 1.06% is the house edge, which, converted to RTP, is 98.94%.

I suspected this to be the case but wanted to be extra sure what exactly the mistake was before replying and planned to visit that section at a later time to check it out.
An RTP of 80% will not get lots of players when there are those much closer to 100%, 1.06% isn't even possible for any game provider.

Does 80% RTP was the theoretical RTP or live RTP? Because 80% is bad if it’s theoretical RTP but I’m not sure how it became that low if they are using the same baccarat rules format.

It’s odd to see a baccarat game with this low theoretical RTP as this game is almost same with other card games like Blackjack that has low house edge.

I think this is live RTP which is possible to be that low based on the current winning percentage of all players.