Quote from: Mahdirakib on Today at 02:20:09 PM

Quote from: bitbollo on Today at 05:45:17 AM

But even this was a "deposit address", now the funds have been credited to the new player? Roll Eyes

? I am asking because I have serious doubts this has been really done... ~

Why are you doubting about this? I believe you know it very well that a deposit gets credited to the account of the users in a casino when it receives the required number of confirmations. 40 LTC isn't a big deal for Stake, and they always credit such small deposits and process withdrawals instantly (if the required wagering is completed).

I think you haven't observed the address yet in which Bitpanda team sent the refund. There were already some incoming transactions on that address when the 40 LTC transaction had come from Bitpanda. It means the user was playing at Stake when the deposit reflected in his account. The user has either lost or withdrawn the funds which he received for Bitpanda mistake. This is why Stake isn't liable here to pay the 40 LTC to OP. I hope you understood the main point here.

TBH, i monitored the wallet, and even if i don't have any proof, i have some reasons to think that this adress isn't a player one.
But i don't want to spread any FUD here, i'll wait for some conclusions (i'm doing some analysis atm).

Also, no answer from Bitpanda today...
Have a nice day guys, i'll keep this post updated