Again, I laughed. Perhaps it should be a telltale at how I respond at any of your post from certain point in the past moving forward. You tried to pull a false virtue to address and own the questions inquiring your ever diminishing reputation, by addressing a completely wrong post. Should speak volume about the the quality of the man behind the screen himself.

Above is post #99, the post questioning your credibility as a rating maker and tendency to make misleading post [of which can also ironically be glimpsed at this poor attempt], is post #172,


that's later revised and added one more point on #176. So, if you want to address anything and clarify your statements or salvage your face, it's post #176. Otherwise, it doesn't interest me to read and address any further proofdemonstration of your incompetency and impotence.

Again, I laughed. Perhaps it should be a telltale at how I respond at any of your post from certain point in the past moving forward. You tried to pull a false virtue to address and own the questions inquiring your ever diminishing reputation, by addressing a completely wrong post. Should speak volume about the the quality of the man behind the screen himself.

Above is post #99, the post questioning your credibility as a rating maker and tendency to make misleading post [of which can also ironically be glimpsed at this poor attempt], is post #172,


that's later revised and added one more point on #176. So, if you want to address anything and clarify your statements or salvage your face, it's post #176. Otherwise, it doesn't interest me to read and address any further proof of your incompetency and impotence.