You are right, I am sorry. I was responding one by one and wanted to avoid editing the same post multiple times and probably having a quote referenced to different versions by other users.
I see your intention to address and reply to multiple statements from different posters, but your execution can lead to your posts being deleted if reported. Or was your intention to boost your number of posts and activity?
It's no rocket science to insert quotes of different posters into one reply, at least when you reply from a desktop browser (mobile browsers can be forced to operate in desktop mode).
Sorry, I didn't want to increase the score, as you saw, I don't have time for that. In the future I will write a coherent answer that includes all the individual answers before publishing it.
I added the recent discovery to the first post and repost it here.
2025 Cambridge Digital Mining Industry Report
https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025-04-cambridge-digital-mining-industry-report.pdfThis report directly addresses that remaining data gap. In an effort to reduce abstractions and rely more heavily on direct practitioner insights, the CCAF has undertaken a comprehensive study, surveying 49 digital mining firms who collectively represent nearly 48% of the implied Bitcoin network hashrate. The findings of this study offer unparalleled insights into operational structures, the ASIC market, industry sentiment, and, most notably, the environmental impact of digital mining operations. Key questions addressed include the geographical distribution of mining activity, the efficiency of deployed hardware, electricity consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and more. For readers less familiar with the subject, an introduction to Bitcoin and digital mining is included to ensure the subsequent content can be fully appreciated.