Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 30/06/2025, 13:39:37 UTC
Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?
Like I said, he was claiming LN-transactions happen offline. That's not true, which makes the feedback factually correct.No, this is not true. The link is not broken and there are many ways you can be tracked. Please don't give incorrect information here.
Quote
To me, I don't see any reason to be given such feedback as I believe that op can be corrected.
OP hasn't even bothered to correct his post, even after he realized it was wrong.~
My knowledge about bitcoin and it's technical knowledge is limited to bitcointalk only not go to an extent of making my research paper, so every time if I have a query I simply refer The Lightning Network FAQ and in this case I used
Are Lightning Network payments more anonymous than on-chain transactions?
Yes, Lightning Network payments are more anonymous. They use onion routing. In short, when a payment is being routed, an intermediary node knows only the previous and the next node in the path. It is impossible to tell who initiated the payment and what the final destination is.
My knowledge about bitcoin and it's technical knowledge is limited to bitcointalk only not go to an extent of making my research paper, so every time if I have a query I simply refer The Lightning Network FAQ and in this case I used
Are Lightning Network payments more anonymous than on-chain transactions?
Yes, Lightning Network payments are more anonymous. They use onion routing. In short, when a payment is being routed, an intermediary node knows only the previous and the next node in the path. It is impossible to tell who initiated the payment and what the final destination is.
If what I said is false information then the guide which received hundreds of merit have wrong information too or I am reading things differently? Well anyways to prove it technically I only used "almost impossible" ≠ "impossible" which is not anything but agreeing with Sato's opinion of there are ways it can be done but I don't want to hide under that, I even responded to him that I am happy to learn if you say how it's done and change what I have told.
Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?
If yes! then do you know if they tried exchanging pm to resolved it internally, and they both didn't aligned?
Neither did he If yes! then do you know if they tried exchanging pm to resolved it internally, and they both didn't aligned?
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65482294#msg65482294
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65483077#msg65483077
In both replies I explicitly asked why I am wrong and I am happy to learn if I wrong here.
I am happy to learn though cause that's what this place is about.
~ I am not dismissing that as long as it's valid with clear explanation.
I didn't send a PM regarding this because I thought we can't come into any mutual agreement. I am not sure what I can discuss further, do you think the tag isn't necessary if I edit the post?
Original archived Re: Incorrect Feedback?
Scraped on 30/06/2025, 13:34:47 UTC
Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?
Like I said, he was claiming LN-transactions happen offline. That's not true, which makes the feedback factually correct.No, this is not true. The link is not broken and there are many ways you can be tracked. Please don't give incorrect information here.
Quote
To me, I don't see any reason to be given such feedback as I believe that op can be corrected.
OP hasn't even bothered to correct his post, even after he realized it was wrong.~
My knowledge about bitcoin and it's technical knowledge is limited to bitcointalk only not go to an extent of making my research paper, so every time if I have a query I simply refer The Lightning Network FAQ and in this case I used
Are Lightning Network payments more anonymous than on-chain transactions?
Yes, Lightning Network payments are more anonymous. They use onion routing. In short, when a payment is being routed, an intermediary node knows only the previous and the next node in the path. It is impossible to tell who initiated the payment and what the final destination is.
My knowledge about bitcoin and it's technical knowledge is limited to bitcointalk only not go to an extent of making my research paper, so every time if I have a query I simply refer The Lightning Network FAQ and in this case I used
Are Lightning Network payments more anonymous than on-chain transactions?
Yes, Lightning Network payments are more anonymous. They use onion routing. In short, when a payment is being routed, an intermediary node knows only the previous and the next node in the path. It is impossible to tell who initiated the payment and what the final destination is.
If what I said is false information then the guide which received hundreds of merit have wrong information too or I am reading things differently? Well anyways to prove it technically I only used "almost impossible" ≠ "impossible" which is not anything but agreeing with Sato's opinion of there are ways it can be done but I don't want to hide under that, I even responded to him that I am happy to learn if you say how it's done and change what I have told.
Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?
If yes! then do you know if they tried exchanging pm to resolved it internally, and they both didn't aligned?
Neither did he If yes! then do you know if they tried exchanging pm to resolved it internally, and they both didn't aligned?
1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65482294#msg65482294
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65483077#msg65483077
In both replies I explicitly asked why I am wrong and I am happy to learn if I wrong here.
I am happy to learn though cause that's what this place is about.
~ I am not dismissing that as long as it's valid with clear explanation.
I didn't send a PM regarding this because I thought we can't come into any mutual agreement.