So now you even started to tell lies? I responded in the reported thread itself [1],[2]

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65482294#msg65482294
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65483077#msg65483077

In both replies I explicitly asked why I am wrong and I am happy to learn if I wrong here.

That's new low, now community don't see the difference between terminology mixup and in what context it's been told but I think that's not the reason why he tagged, it is because I said the trail breaks with LN and he said NO, it doesn't but he is someone who explain things in detailed didn't gave me anything much other than this.

Reading a paper such as this one could be interesting to you: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12470.

Generally a lot of the below applies directly to Bitcoin and using Lightning Network, you just have to translate the things. Are you using a custodial wallet, are you using your own node or SPV, and so on.

There are some quick notes what you need to consider and how you can be tracked, loosely ordered on the easiness of tracking you:

So now you even started to tell lies? I responded in the reported thread itself [1],[2]

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65482294#msg65482294
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65483077#msg65483077

In both replies I explicitly asked why I am wrong and I am happy to learn if I wrong here.

Quote from: LoyceV on June 30, 2025, 10:04:02 AM

Quote from: Perfectbaby on June 30, 2025, 09:20:13 AM

Well, does that mean that op deserved the given feedback from your own judgement?

Like I said, he was claiming LN-transactions happen offline. That's not true, which makes the feedback factually correct.

That's new low, now community don't see the difference between terminology mixup and in what context it's been told but I think that's not the reason why he tagged, it is because I said the trail breaks with LN and he said NO, it doesn't but he is someone who explain things in detailed didn't gave me anything much other than this.

I hope that you have understood that my answer applies pretty much directly to LN as well. Just think about it, starting with the address reuse example. In addition, there are probably some LN specific concerns. Reading a paper such as this one could be interesting to you: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12470.

So now you even started to tell lies? I responded in the reported thread itself [1],[2]

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65482294#msg65482294
2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5482297.msg65483077#msg65483077

In both replies I explicitly asked why I am wrong and I am happy to learn if I wrong here.

That's new low, now community don't see the difference between terminology mixup and in what context it's been told but I think that's not the reason why he tagged, it is because I said the trail breaks with LN and he said NO, it doesn't but he is someone who explain things in detailed didn't gave me anything much other than this.
The answer is in the same post that you quoted and cut off, you are just a very lazy spammer. Worse, there is also an answer in a previous post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5546439.msg65473020#msg65473020.

Please stop wasting everyone's time, you are clearly wrong and are not interested in learning much or taking responsibility.