I don't know why some guys continue to make the point that source income might not be enough.
Generally speaking, we should be able to assume that it is better to have both a source income and a steady income.
I don’t know what you guys mean by source income, care to educate me on that?Or should I just assume the reverse of the other which is steady income making source income an income source that isn’t steady or discontinuous.
When someone is talking about
source of income,
I don’t know what you guys mean by source income, care to educate me on that?
Or should I just assume the reverse of the other which is steady income making source income an income source that isn’t steady or discontinuous.
It surprises me to see that There are people who does not understand the meaning of
source of income till this time, though I can't possibly say that you don't understand the meaning of source of income.
While reading from JayJuanGee, what I saw there is
sourced income and not
source of income like you guys are putting here. Arguably, any means you get income from is a source of income right? Either it’s steady of not. I still classifies as a source of income.
Now, having to say source income and yet again go ahead to say steady income source puts this two in a contrasting view. Don’t know if you guys get what I’m saying but, that’s the how I did understood it which made me ask if, that’s was entirely a different term unknown to me.
Though, if you guys are here saying, source income and source of income are the same thing, just used interchangeably, then I understand.