Quote from: SatoPrincess on July 01, 2025, 05:53:18 PM

Quote from: Lillominato89 on June 28, 2025, 01:40:58 PM

Quote from: SatoPrincess on June 28, 2025, 01:33:06 PM

I responded to this post last week and it caught my eye. It’s uncommon to see a legendary account using AI to generate posts, I would like to hear his response. So far I haven’t seen any posts in his account history that is AI written. The post I quoted looks human written but the source link clearly shows that it’s gotten from ChatGPT. I want to know, are cases like this given a pass?

Quote from: Lillominato89 on June 22, 2025, 09:01:00 PM

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/35383362/man-utd-transfer-news-live-hojlund-rashford-mbeumo-updates/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Apparently some big Italian clubs are interested in Manchester United player Hojlund. Currently Inter are in the lead, and also have the player's appreciation but the English club would like a direct transfer, Inter instead opts for a loan with obligation to buy! As a third striker he would be ideal for Inter, even if honestly I would never spend 45 million for a reserve
What are your opinions?

Look, I didn't use any artificial intelligence to write the post, I simply asked chatgpt to find me an article in English and I only inserted the link. Is it forbidden? If yes I apologize and it will not be done by me again
This is my answer to your question

I know you didn’t you use AI to write the post. Like I said in my earlier post, it’s quite obvious that the post was human written.

Yes I had read and understood your post well, but you wanted to know what I would reply and I gave you my reasons. No controversy mate, I then asked if using links from chatgpt or any other AI was forbidden or not, but I received no reply from anyone