Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on Today at 08:02:16 AM

Quote from: _act_ on Today at 07:39:24 AM

Quote from: Lillominato89 on July 02, 2025, 06:58:27 PM

Yes I had read and understood your post well, but you wanted to know what I would reply and I gave you my reasons. No controversy mate, I then asked if using links from chatgpt or any other AI was forbidden or not, but I received no reply from anyone

You used AI to get a link but all what you posted there like this is written by you and not AI. There is no tool that can even know that you get the link through AI. There is nothing wrong in doing something like this.

I find it pathetic that we still have to be discussing this. I'm not saying this for you, Lillominato89, but it should simply be obvious that if you use ChatGPT or some AI to do internet searches, which is becoming more and more common, and post the link, no one should think there is any problem about it.

At the time I proposed some rules for good use of AI in the forum, because until then all the discussion was focused on the opposite point of view: how to curb the use of AI in the forum.

Acceptable uses of AI in the forum (unofficial)

To end up putting item 6 on that list I previously had a heated discussion that concluded with me reporting my own post.

From then on no one should doubt that using AI to do searches, citing the source, is a legitimate use of AI in the forum.

I totally agree with you, using an AI and quoting it in your posts should be considered fair use!
The situation that bothers me is that I found myself in this discussion because the source (chatgpt) was cited on the link to the newspaper article. I use AI, but for my own purposes and not to make it write posts for me. It should be noted that I write very badly in English, it is not my native language unfortunately.