50,000!

Bet yah, Philipma1957 is.
I’m still figuring out how you guys do it. 50,000 is no joke!
10 posts OrbitalX? and you are wondering about Philip? wonder away... and perhaps go and look at some of phil's post history.. if you dare to at least do a bit of leg work..
Otherwise, you makes little to no senses.
Another thing, have you heard about bitcoin? Phil is struggling with such topic too.. but still.. he has 50k + posts, and some of them even deal with bitcoin.
Maybe you (OrbitalX) could start out and get to know us.. (if you care about such a thingie?) by focusing substantively on dee cornz as a possible topic?
Do you care about any of that?
good morning WO!
What happened while I slept last night any thing interesting
From the perspective of this here cat, it is not a good sign if you feel that you gotta ask...
But hey whatever.. .. I probably need to chill out my self... since I can appreciate that everybody cannot be like yours truly... That would be problematic in a whole hell-of-a-lot of various ways.. .. which I should not even attempt to enumerate, even though it could serve as a decently interesting "Twilight Zone" episode.
good morning WO!
What happened while I slept last night any thing interesting
Trump and Elon are back at each other's throats with Elon saying he's going to start a new political party after seeing the wasteful government spending. Meanwhile Trump says he's going to look into Elon's government subsidies and calls him the most subsidized person on earth...
The most exciting news yesterday was probably the tokenization of stocks. You can now buy 60 different stocks on the Solana blockchain, which is interesting. It makes me sad this sort of innovation isn't coming to Bitcoin, but still cool to think you can provide a liquidity pair with the S&P 500 and Bitcoin and earn interest in both, even if you can't do it on Bitcoin's blockchain.
If you could have at least refrained (or restrained yourself) from such a pussy attack on bitcoin (as if you don't know who brought you to this dance), then the rest of your post would have had been a wee bit less cringe..
I ate to compliment you after that seemingly inability to control ur lil selfie.
To the other Eh team members here,
🅷🅰🅿🅿🆈 🅲🅰🅽🅰🅳🅰 🅳🅰🆈!!🍁
"eh"
o.k. Now, after a wee bit of internal reflection on the ways of the world
(and arguable "teams"), I think that I kind of understand what you be talkin bout Willis.
Go ........
**Ain't I Mr. culturally "sensitive?"I don't like it when politicians and tech bros fight.
This is NOT bullish for tech, and maybe even bitcoin.
I am not sure how the fighting of politicians, tech bros, etc, matters much for dee cornz... I mean.. surely we have some additional attention that comes to bitcoin from time to time and/or various attacks or attempts to buddy up.. but in the whole scheme of things?
What?
What if we were to have hostility towards dee cornz versus buddying up with dee cornz? I suppose that the "buddying up" feels better for dee HODLers of cornz, yet we likely cannot really be sure if the "buddying up" part is actually "genuine," instead of being "a trap."
I will admit.. I feel better about "buddying up."
I would proclaim that bears are never going to go extinct.
Bears will just have to find another line to defend at some higher price point (I mean to the extent that they did not end up getting totally wrecked along the way.. and so yeah, sometimes new bears will replace the old bears)...
We also know that sometimes these twats just have to let the BTC price run for a while, and one of my favorites that I continue to repeat and get enamoured over is the Uppity break of $500 in May 2016, and surely the "writing was on the wall" in November 2015 when the BTC price temporarily broke $500 but then corrected back down and got stuck in the lower $400s for nearly 6 months...... and yeah, any of us who knew, knew.. "We" pretty much knew by November 2015 that the bears had already lost that late 2015/early 2016 battle for $500... ..and we did not even really need to see then May 2016 break UPpity, even though sure, it did not hurt to see it actually play out.
Right now, I cannot be sure when we might be at those kinds of points, since it can be so difficult to really have strong senses while we are going through the seemingly "suffering."
Yes, I said it.
"Suffering."
We have been "suffering" in the lower $100ks since December.. and I suppose many of us already knew that "$100k is not the top," yet some folks did not get the memo. Some folks still consider $100k as if it were some kind of a "meaningful top," and yeah, they are missing something in their assessment of the bitcoin matter... and they don't know where we are at, where we might be going, and/or how we got here..
So for some reason they consider $100k-ish as if it were some kind of a high price..
Oh? gawd.. ...


Maybe it is a matter of knowing yet not knowing? Since surely I am not going to proclaim to know details of either how far we are going or even any details as to when, exactly.
Accordingly, I cannot even say that I know that we are at the departing point yet or not.. even though surely hanging around $100k for right around 7 months is no laughing matter...
and still, it can be quite difficult to know details.. during these seemingly early budding run times, rather than at some later point when it seems to be "running" or even already having had been running, and even when BTC prices are "running," it still can be difficult to have confidence in how far it is going to go or how long it is going to last.