When I saw the way Satofan44 was handling his trust feedback, I saw him as a good poster that is doing the opposite of good posting if it trust feedback and he is not worthy to be a DT member. As this thread builds up, he continued to let us know that. He is no more a DT member which is good.
Defending spam is good, I got it already. You don't have to make it so obvious.
Perhaps it would be wiser to first focus on getting senior members to remove such ratings than to ask a DT newbie to behave better than them since day 0?

For the remaining posts, I gave merit as I agree and thank them for their responses. I don't want to waste any more time of other people by continuing those discussions in this topic.
Good decision. Your ignorance just kicked you off the DT network. That escalated too quickly. The wisest would be to hear what the community says. Probably you are too experienced with technical things, but you have a lot to learn about the forum. As I said before, don't look at what some random people do. You should focus on what most people do. If some people say you are bad, don't count on that. But if most people say you are bad, I think you should work on that. Most people in this thread opposed your tagging behaviour, and you got some DT exclusions quickly, which kicked you out of the DT network. I strongly believe you have a lot of potential to grow. Just be humble instead of being aggressive.
I don't care about
thisyour useless trust system
I have previously indicated this, stop
writing nonsense because of your signature campaignposting spam. Let the centralized system be handled by people who like centralized systems.
I left a new feedback to see what would happen, and those that reacted made the error by showing themselves. A pattern of entrenched and corrupt interests makes itself quickly visible.
Perhaps it is time to lock this thread to avoid further signature spam, your case is resolved.