Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 03/07/2025, 14:12:34 UTC
The same complaints were made in Shuffle's thread made also by newbie/brand new accounts.
Were the complaints in Casino Guru made by newbies/brand new accounts too? Or were they made by trustworthy individuals?
Were the complaints in Casino Guru made by newbies/brand new accounts too? Or were they made by trustworthy individuals?
You aren't making much sense here. Most complainants in this forum and any other site for that matter are newbie accounts since they found those sites through their research and created accounts to find some sort of resolution to their problems.
To give them the benefit of the doubt, yes. But could we actually verify that they're actual "newbies" in the casino world.
If you believe that everyone in BitcoinTalk should trust in every brand new accounts/newbies' posts, then the forum would be vulnerable to social-engineering attacks.
Quote
Ranking doesn't automatically clarify how trustworthy a particular individual is in any site basically. Other factors like validity of proof etc matter too.
But their complaints, merely because they made them, also doesn't prove their innocence, no?
The debate will always go back to holydarkness' posts because it NOW makes sense.
Original archived Re: Rollbit.com | Crypto's Most Rewarding Casino 👑
Scraped on 03/07/2025, 14:07:47 UTC
The same complaints were made in Shuffle's thread made also by newbie/brand new accounts.
Were the complaints in Casino Guru made by newbies/brand new accounts too? Or were they made by trustworthy individuals?
Were the complaints in Casino Guru made by newbies/brand new accounts too? Or were they made by trustworthy individuals?
You aren't making much sense here. Most complainants in this forum and any other site for that matter are newbie accounts since they found those sites through their research and created accounts to find some sort of resolution to their problems.
To give them the benefit of the doubt, yes. But could we actually verify that they're actual "newbies" in the casino world.
Quote
Ranking doesn't automatically clarify how trustworthy a particular individual is in any site basically. Other factors like validity of proof etc matter too.
But their complaints, merely because they made them, also doesn't prove their innocence, no?
The debate will always go back to holydarkness' posts because it NOW makes sense.