Am not the type that likes politics, but i don't want to know the reason that can permit others to have a nuclear weapon while Iran is being deprived of this same privilege, they are truly advancing in their technology, but if some thinks it's unsafe for the world, then the same should apply to other countries as well who have already developed theirs.
The problem is that despite having the technology, Iran has never moved toward making the bomb. Iran's nuclear program has always been a civilian and peaceful one and has been under the most number of inspections by the IAEA.
The reason why Iran is "deprived" of this right is because they have a regime that rutinarily calls for the destruction of another state (Israel) and it would be unwise to allow then to take action on that regard.
You mean the Zionist terrorist organization that has been carrying out a genocide in Palestine? The whole world is now demanding its destruction. As an example try visiting the music festivals in England these days and listen to what they're chanting...
https://www.aparat.com/v/ohf36w9Iran has been selling Sahed drones by the thousands to Russia to be used directly against Ukrainian major cities
I've already explained it a dozen times, I won't repeat it.
You on the other hand have not yet explained why Ukraine has been cooperating, training and arming al-Qaeda without even hiding it.
By the way, Iran has arrested multiple Ukrainian terrorists in some Iranian cities over the past weeks. How do you justify that?
If the country and the system which manages it does not even allow their citizens to wear what they want during their daily routines,
Other people don't get to decide what indecent exposure laws exist in other countries. The people of that country and their representatives in the parliament who pass these laws do. And they do that based on their values and culture.
but they have no saying on whether they want to remove their supreme leader through a referendum through direct vote, but even mention that supreme leader is set to rule the country for the rest of his life after being selected.
That's not how it works, the leader is elected by people's representatives and is set to remain in that position as long as he is fit for that position both of which are again decided by those representatives who are directly elected by the people though elections every couple of years.
This democratic system is also put to vote and in a referendum after the revolution, 98% of the population voted for it. The Iran's Constitution and all its principles are also put to a referendum and people voted for it and its changes.
So again just because you don't understand it and don't think the political system and all its components that people of that country voted for is not democratic, doesn't make it so.