Quote from: wheeljunkie on Today at 12:36:39 PM

Quote from: dimonstration on Today at 12:20:33 PM

Quote from: wheeljunkie on Today at 12:15:22 PM

You are asking if anyone have the capacity of infinite funds? Roll Eyes

Martingale is not a strategy, it is a stupid hack that is disguised as a strategy and it does not work. If it worked, casinos would be bankrupt by now. People need to stop believing in fairy tales, there is no winning strategy and there can never be one.

There’s no infinite cash but a billionaire like Bezos can beat the casino bankroll if he will do a martingale strategy continuously.

This is the reason why casino has bet limit on their game so that no one can beat their bankroll no matter how high roller you are. But if we remove those limits and assuming that casino games is fair, I think Billionaire can beat a casino with low bankroll.

No one can beat since billionaire don’t gamble in a casino.

That is not true, it just shows that you don't understand the faults of martingale and that it is not a strategy. If the casino had a bankroll that could accept bets in the billions range, even Bezos would go bankrupt with martingale. Beating a casino with a low bankroll is pretty meaningless. We were talking about martingale and actually beating a casino, not about $5000 casinos. Cheesy

I do mention a low bankroll casino to be fair. There’s casino with small bankroll that can be easily beat by playing a simple martingale given that you have a Billion dollar fund.

In theory, A casino is impossible to beat since they do have decent bankroll that can withstand player bet even with martingale. I do understand the math behind and the risk involved.

I just don’t like the argument that an infinite funds can never beat a casino. That’s an absurd thinking since I can drop a 1B bet then Martingale it to infinity.

I do emphasize a small bankroll