The only place we can use the word "banned" is for betpanda. I was not banned anywhere else. Ever. Yes i was limited, but i can still place bets even if they are microscopic.
It feels like even tho i have been transparent through this whole case, something betpanda has never been, with only vague claims and shallow excuses, you are minimizing or excusing their actions.
It's sickening that can they just have kind of behavior, and there is no one to turn to. This site is indeed a fucking scam.
Do you want to get limited to microscopic amount instead of being entirely banned? I will talk with my contact and see if that can be arranged if you want. Nonetheless, with you being limited in several other casinos by betby, I guess their own risk assessment's call as well as betby's are founded. Therefore, I believe it is beyond overseers' belief that the case can be safely closed.
Damn dude, that's alot of influence you got there

. So, you're saying that, since i've been limited in all betby's i played at, betpanda is on the right by banning me. Alright.
The question as to why other betby casinos have paid me doesn't matter at all, right? The fact that i wasn't banned anywhere else ever doesn't matter too. Nothing matters. Only thing that matters is that i was limited.
I challenge you and your contacts and betpanda representative to come here and tell me where or when did i break ToS to get banned.
Wouldn't that be a better way to use all that influence and contacts of yours?
Throughout this thread, i have raised so many questions, nothing was answered. All shoved aside like it doesn't matter.
You and Mr. Betpanda representative talked about "suspicious betting activity", while i posted my betting activity for a whole month.
Okay then, pick a date, year and month, and i'll post my betting activity.
Saying this case can be "safely closed" is shameless behavior.