Hello,
We are of course not in a position to comment on what the procedures of other casinos are, what their terms look like or what their policy is when a user breaches their Terms and Conditions.
However, the actions taken by Betby would strongly suggest to us that the suspicious betting behaviour the player was investigated for initially was/is calculated and systematic.
If this behaviour would indeed be coincidental and by chance as they claim, they wouldn't have been limited across all the operators, only at Betpanda.
Therefore we would like to reiterate that we are not a "scam" as is falsely claimed, but simply acting upon suspicious behaviour suspected and investigated (and now confirmed) by our sportsbook provider as per our Terms and Conditions.
We have brought this up several times internally with senior management and with all the information which has been made available to us through various mediums, we are not in a position to offer a refund due to the aforementioned reasons.
We do understand that this is not the outcome you were looking for, but the substantial action taken by Betby validated our suspicions and cemented their decision.
Hence, Betpanda considers the matter closed.
So predictable to use the "limitations" as an excuse. I shared it here just for transparency's sake, since i got nothing to hide, unlike you.
I literally shared my "suspicious betting activity" here for all to see.
I have been playing at betby casinos for 4 years. Always the exact same "betting pattern". It was until i opened this thread that this happen. I'm pretty sure if i kept my mouth shut, i wouldn't get limited anywhere. But i am exposing you as a scam, trash, garbage casino. Everyone who has followed this thread, and others like mine against you, will see exactly what you are. Hopefully this will save many players from playing at your scamhouse.
You say you cannot comment on other casinos procedures and ToS, because you can't. You say:
"However, the actions taken by Betby would strongly suggest to us that the suspicious betting behaviour the player was investigated for initially was/is calculated and systematic.
If this behaviour would indeed be coincidental and by chance as they claim, they wouldn't have been limited across all the operators, only at Betpanda."
Sure, but i can go another route, or point of view. Why did 3 betby casinos paid me after you wrongfully banned me?
Why are you not asking that? If, like you say, it wasn't coincidental and by chance as "whoever they" are, why did they pay? You can't answer. Because you know exactly what you are doing. It's called a scam.
Why do you assume, that i got limited because of betting activity? Maybe i was limited because i win too much. I mean, i deposited 2.5mbtc and got to 18.2mbtc at your casino. I would limit that guy too.
Feel free to share my "suspicious betting activity" with the class.
Enjoy your dirty 1700€. I hope you buy many balloons and confetti to celebrate another successfull scam. Or maybe use it to buy more bot accounts to boost your trustpilot ratings.

Uhh... actually... I think the more likely narrative that happen here with BetPanda was that your bet on BetPanda got flagged by Betby, then BP create their own risk assessment team following Betby's decision that they deemed need to be reassessed [this point is pretty much established in past posts and interactions]. While for Betby, in the meantime, maybe someone from Betby
do check this forum periodically, or maybe someone from WSM, or other casinos, reading and learning that you're restricted by Betby on BP, inquired to Betby, and that leads to universal ban from Betby.
I doubted that, though. Because casinos will not want to lose their customers, and they're literally throwing their revenue away if they ask Betby that.
So, the more logical narrative is the flag that Betby placed on you from BetPanda's bettings finally caught up with their algorithm on several casinos to detect same accounts, thus locking you out.
Why now and not for the past 4 years? No one knows, as the decision is solely based on Betby's call. But the fact that a limitation-hammer imposed upon you betby-provided-casinos wide, should tell that there probably
is something unfavorable on your betting preference by Betby. I would dare to assume that Betby need to collect more data to be certain on which casinos were you at. Whether this username xxx on yyy casino is you or not. Which accumulated as you play. But that's just me and my guesses.
Point is... I don't think BP has any influence on this, it's betby who ban you across casinos.
The only place we can use the word "banned" is for betpanda. I was not banned anywhere else. Ever. Yes i was limited, but i can still place bets even if they are microscopic.
It feels like even tho i have been transparent through this whole case, something betpanda has never been, with only vague claims and shallow excuses, you are minimizing or excusing their actions.
It's sickening that can they just have kind of behavior, and there is no one to turn to. This site is indeed a fucking scam.