Do you want to get limited to microscopic amount instead of being entirely banned? I will talk with my contact and see if that can be arranged if you want. Nonetheless, with you being limited in several other casinos by betby, I guess their own risk assessment's call as well as betby's are founded. Therefore, I believe it is beyond overseers' belief that the case can be safely closed.
Damn dude, that's alot of influence you got there
. The keyword is "see if that can be arranged". Not a lot of influence, I believe, as I am not sure myself if that's feasible. Just an option and a path I am willing to convey to my contact if you wished.
So, you're saying that, since i've been limited in all betby's i played at, betpanda is on the right by banning me. Alright.
The question as to why other betby casinos have paid me doesn't matter at all, right? The fact that i wasn't banned anywhere else ever doesn't matter too. Nothing matters. Only thing that matters is that i was limited.
The question as to why other betby casinos have paid me doesn't matter at all, right? The fact that i wasn't banned anywhere else ever doesn't matter too. Nothing matters. Only thing that matters is that i was limited.
I am saying one is a coincidence and probably a mistake, two is questionable, three and beyond... is a pattern. Do you have a better explanation or label or outcome following a revelation that you're limited from all betby-provided casinos?
I challenge you and your contacts and betpanda representative to come here and tell me where or when did i break ToS to get banned.
Wouldn't that be a better way to use all that influence and contacts of yours?
Throughout this thread, i have raised so many questions, nothing was answered. All shoved aside like it doesn't matter.
You and Mr. Betpanda representative talked about "suspicious betting activity", while i posted my betting activity for a whole month.
Okay then, pick a date, year and month, and i'll post my betting activity.
Saying this case can be "safely closed" is shameless behavior.
Wouldn't that be a better way to use all that influence and contacts of yours?
Throughout this thread, i have raised so many questions, nothing was answered. All shoved aside like it doesn't matter.
You and Mr. Betpanda representative talked about "suspicious betting activity", while i posted my betting activity for a whole month.
Okay then, pick a date, year and month, and i'll post my betting activity.
Saying this case can be "safely closed" is shameless behavior.
I'll just respond this with a gentle smile and a sincere [empty] wish that you can see what me and my contact discussed, and the length we took to try your case. Really. I do really wished you can see the length we both take for you. Then maybe you'll understand the efforts exhausted just for you. But the call didn't come from our hand. People always asked who am I and my answer will remains consistent: I am no one. So, if there is a delusion of grandeur that I am influential, sadly but confidently, I'll say that if ever uttered, it didn't come from me.
At times, I'm stoically thick-skinning myself at people lashing, but another small part of time, I'm tired of people venting and kicking and clawing their anger at the wrong person. For the record, I even tried to rake through AG yesterday for your case, to get something to help my contact to convince BP to reconsider and perhaps find a common ground, but after re-read the thread I find that AG refuse to mediate.
With this and the weariness, I wish you a very good luck in pursuing someone with "all that influence and contact" that can overturn the case. Kindly inform us if there is a significant update of your case being retried somewhere by an influential being. I'll change the status back to "in progress".