I agree with that and maybe we can take the example of Manchester City, they recruited players in the middle of last season and at the end of this season they continued to recruit new players, but unfortunately the steps and efforts they made did not get satisfactory results. They failed to get a single trophy this season, and most recently had to be eliminated in the last 16 of the WWC by Al Hilal.

However, if the club is more careful in recruiting players, this can really change the depth of the squad and make the team perform significantly better on the field.

Having new set of players does not actually means the team performance will improve, but some changes made in the squad will really show how well they can go that season even if they’re not at the top of their games throughout the season. The top premier league teams have all prepared for the next seasons and buying potential players that could make the whole game changes and they come out victorious at the end of the season. Time will tell those that their new signing will show effects immediately.


I will say this is bad market for them in particular and they have to accept the loss that will be incurred from selling this players. Football is a business venture also, sometimes you win and sometimes you lose, so for this players, I can categorically say that Manchester United had a bad deal here. I hope they will use the money to buy better players now and not make same mistakes they did years ago to full the team with bunch of flops who could not add any significant impact to the whole team. They better scout well before signing any players now.  

Buying new players is always a roll of dice. If the players you buy are good and they fit your system then you will become much better, and if the players you buy turn out to be not fit your team and play bad then you will become worse. We have seen this plenty of times in plenty of seasons, it's always an unknown until it is not. So we need to consider how this will go with time, it's not going to beknown beforehand.

Liverpool, Arsenal, City, these are all great teams and we have no idea how they will play until they end up playing. This is why we need to give it some time. By week 10 or so, you will see clearly which team is doing how. Obviously we can see before that too, but week 10 makes it guaranteed for everyone. At that point, only injuries change teams, otherwise they are what they are all year.

Having new players in the team does not guarantee that a team's performance can immediately improve because most players also need to adapt to a new atmosphere where the team will also see a new atmosphere with players who are different from before. But this can also have other effects as you said where the team must try these steps in order to have the potential expected in the next season. Because when the team does not buy new players when there is an opportunity and ability, the team's condition will not change in a different direction.

I quite agree with you because bringing new players does not guarantee the rapid improvement but I am very much confidence if the player bought are very strong one and can easily adapt it will be a great advantage to the team, they will have chances of performing excellently at the beginning. I'm also in support of Liverpool make it very early because training together before next season begins it will make things easy for them to get adopted and also for the coach, it will help him to identify the strength of each player and what they can do.

As regard to City at least the effort they are making is quite interesting and also getting players is also a sign that they are really preparing, I don't just know what is their problem but the players look very strong, but I trust Pep Guardiola is going to put more effort this time because his name has been painted black which he need to correct throughout his remaining two season as Manchester City head coach.