Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Edited on 07/07/2025, 23:23:50 UTC
[...]
I've already explained it a dozen times, I won't repeat it.
You on the other hand have not yet explained why Ukraine has been cooperating, training and arming al-Qaeda without even hiding it.

By the way, Iran has arrested multiple Ukrainian terrorists in some Iranian cities over the past weeks. How do you justify that?
[...]

How do I justify YOUR fake information? I am not sure you really understand who has to justify what.

Iran is a democracy!

[...]

As far as Islam and Nuclear weapons is concerned. Islam prohibits killing of innocent and unarmed people and also prohibits attacking others without any strong reason but instruct it's followers to be ready for self defence. Pakistan acquire nuclear technology only after India acquired and tested it. We were no more on earth map, if we were don't have nuclear weapons and this technology has forced India to stay outside our territory.

If USA, Israel, France, UK can acquire nuclear weapons then why not Iran can have them for self defence?

Iran is NOT a democracy. One of the pillars of Democracy is the ability of any citizen (sometimes with some requirements of age or nationality) to be a candidate. In Iran, candidates are vetoed by the Theocratic junta which is permanent and not elected. But I of course can understand that you are very confused about what is a Democracty and how it works.

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consejo_de_Guardianes


There is no "legal" reason why Iran, as estate and regardless of being or not democratic, could not develop any weapon they choose. But, there is also no particular reason why Israel of the US will allow them to do so.

Again, if you tell me everyday that you want to see me dead, there is no legal reason preventing you to buy a gun, but I am going to make it as difficult as possible for you for obvious reasons.

That defence argument... is it false. India or Pakistan or any other nuclear power have no plan nor have shown any intention to invade Iran.

The real reason is much simpler: The nukes are not to protect "Iran", they are to protect the current Ayatollah's regime. It would be in everyone's interes to have a estable government when they have nukes. Same with Putin - US does not want to kill or "dethrone" because they know Putin understands the consequences of using nukes.

That is the reason to have nukes, and that is the reason why other countries will not allow it.

Funny that you mention Islam and the banning of killing, etc... But then defend Al Asad and the Iranian regime.
Original archived Re: Another reason US regime (Axis) attacked Iran is Iran's vast scientific advances
Scraped on 07/07/2025, 22:54:10 UTC
Iran is a democracy!

[...]

As far as Islam and Nuclear weapons is concerned. Islam prohibits killing of innocent and unarmed people and also prohibits attacking others without any strong reason but instruct it's followers to be ready for self defence. Pakistan acquire nuclear technology only after India acquired and tested it. We were no more on earth map, if we were don't have nuclear weapons and this technology has forced India to stay outside our territory.

If USA, Israel, France, UK can acquire nuclear weapons then why not Iran can have them for self defence?

Iran is NOT a democracy. One of the pillars of Democracy is the ability of any citizen (sometimes with some requirements of age or nationality) to be a candidate. In Iran, candidates are vetoed by the Theocratic junta which is permanent and not elected. But I of course can understand that you are very confused about what is a Democracty and how it works.

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consejo_de_Guardianes


There is no "legal" reason why Iran, as estate and regardless of being or not democratic, could not develop any weapon they choose. But, there is also no particular reason why Israel of the US will allow them to do so.

Again, if you tell me everyday that you want to see me dead, there is no legal reason preventing you to buy a gun, but I am going to make it as difficult as possible for you for obvious reasons.

That defence argument... is it false. India or Pakistan or any other nuclear power have no plan nor have shown any intention to invade Iran.

The real reason is much simpler: The nukes are not to protect "Iran", they are to protect the current Ayatollah's regime. It would be in everyone's interes to have a estable government when they have nukes. Same with Putin - US does not want to kill or "dethrone" because they know Putin understands the consequences of using nukes.

That is the reason to have nukes, and that is the reason why other countries will not allow it.

Funny that you mention Islam and the banning of killing, etc... But then defend Al Asad and the Iranian regime.