Re: Epstein Truth.

Quote from: o48o on July 08, 2025, 11:54:20 AM

Quote from: OgNasty on July 08, 2025, 10:13:28 AM

The government trying to say that Epstein didn’t do anything wrong and killed himself for no reason is pretty wild. If you look up the definition of gaslighting, I think you’ll find this is the most clear cut and obvious case of government gaslighting in our lifetimes. I actually don’t see how they’ll get away with this. Black swan event incoming….

This means that Trump basically confirms that all accusations against him over this were true, but he just thinks there's nothing wrong about what he did.

Funny enough, i would buy the part where Epstein would kill himself, but he definitely was in prison for a reason. It would be stupid to assume that someone as linked as him would be jailed without overwhelming evidence.

And it's not really difficult to deduct that who are the ones lying and covering everything up here. Everything was on their possession. Who is the deep state now?

That's like saying that Trump does a deep dive into everything that goes on in the world. There aren't enough hours in the day. That's why Trump has surrounded himself with people who he thinks will support him and the truth. But, of course, they all make mistakes. Consider:

Cage Match

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2025/07/07/cage-match/#more-371258
Who knows what to believe these days? Well, what would you expect after years, even decades, of anti-reality operations by everyone from the CIA to The New York Times to Harvard U. Is it any wonder that reality-optionality is making the people both apathetic and insane?

We are told now by the FBI that there is no evidence that Jeffrey Epstein ran a blackmail operation against the politicos of Western Civ, or that a "client list" existed, or that JE was murdered in his jail cell. It well might be true that there is no evidence, strictly speaking.

Messrs. Patel and Bongino, coming into office rather late in the Epstein game, were apparently left with big bag of nuthin. What else can they truthfully report? So, they had to put it out there, knowing a whole lot of people would be miffed. "We've got nuthin, sorry." Were they chagrined to do that? Evidently so. Of course, this Epstein business has been going on for years and years and it is certainly possible that the most damning evidence has been destroyed by interested parties.

Personally, I find it implausible that absolutely nothing ever leaked, no video of, say, Tony Blair or Bill Clinton violating a child, if it ever happened. Everything else in our world leaks, eventually. And there were supposedly how many cameras around the Epstein properties, and how many thousands of hours of video recordings? There is more video of Bigfoot than of compromised Epstein bigshots. Just sayin'.

AG Pam Bondi, the FBIs boss, also has some 'splainin' to do. In February, she claimed to have the Epstein client list "sitting on my desk right now to review," and hinted it would be released shortly. That material, when released, turned out to be the old dog-eared flight logs that have been circulating through every news outlet for years. Did she not know the difference between an alleged "client list" and the old flight logs? Let's face it: seems kind of dumb. . . seems like the AG got played. . . and now the mob on "X" is having sport with her.

Among the miffed, apparently, is Elon Musk. At the height of his feud with Mr. Trump, on June 5, Elon put out a message on his "X" platform saying, "@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!". This intemperate utterance naturally prompts you to wonder: how (or what) might Elon know about any supposed Epstein evidence? At this point, the FBI might send somebody to inquire. Did Elon, who has more money than even Scrooge McDuck, somehow manage to buy up all those alleged blackmail tapes? Does he otherwise know where they might have disappeared to? Has he ever seen anything? Anyway, he didn't produce any actual evidence.
...