Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 3
Last scraped
Edited on 16/07/2025, 08:24:32 UTC
[Thank you for your reply
In this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548990.msg65563546#msg65563546 it is mentioned that the new version of Electrum cannot sign legacy addresses starting with 1, which is exactly my case.
What could be the solution to this issue?
You can sign an address using legacy address on Electrum. You can also see that on the thread let me quote it.In this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548990.msg65563546#msg65563546 it is mentioned that the new version of Electrum cannot sign legacy addresses starting with 1, which is exactly my case.
What could be the solution to this issue?
Electrum can sign with legacy addresses and those signatures can be verified by other wallet software because there's a standard behind it. But when it comes to non-legacy addresses there is no standard signature format so electrum generated signatures can't be verified by other wallet software.
Abdussamad is absolutely correct.
Edit:
Here is an example, I have just signed it on Electrum using legacy address generated on a BIP39 wallet but imported into Electrum:
Warning: Do not display your address publicly, for your own privacy.
Version 2
Edited on 09/07/2025, 08:54:30 UTC
[Thank you for your reply
In this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548990.msg65563546#msg65563546 it is mentioned that the new version of Electrum cannot sign legacy addresses starting with 1, which is exactly my case.
What could be the solution to this issue?
You can sign an address using legacy address on Electrum. You can also see that on the thread let me quote it.In this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548990.msg65563546#msg65563546 it is mentioned that the new version of Electrum cannot sign legacy addresses starting with 1, which is exactly my case.
What could be the solution to this issue?
Electrum can sign with legacy addresses and those signatures can be verified by other wallet software because there's a standard behind it. But when it comes to non-legacy addresses there is no standard signature format so electrum generated signatures can't be verified by other wallet software.
Abdussamad is absolutely correct.
Edit:
Here is an example, I have just signed it on Electrum using legacy address generated on a BIP39 wallet but imported into Electrum:
Warning: Do not display your address publicly, for your own privacy.
Version 1
Scraped on 09/07/2025, 08:29:40 UTC
[Thank you for your reply
In this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548990.msg65563546#msg65563546 it is mentioned that the new version of Electrum cannot sign legacy addresses starting with 1, which is exactly my case.
What could be the solution to this issue?
You can sign an address using legacy address on Electrum. You can also see that In this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548990.msg65563546#msg65563546 it is mentioned that the new version of Electrum cannot sign legacy addresses starting with 1, which is exactly my case.
What could be the solution to this issue?
Electrum can sign with legacy addresses and those signatures can be verified by other wallet software because there's a standard behind it. But when it comes to non-legacy addresses there is no standard signature format so electrum generated signatures can't be verified by other wallet software.
Abdussamad is absolutely correct.
Original archived Re: Sign message with Electrum&Trezor
Scraped on 09/07/2025, 08:24:47 UTC
[Thank you for your reply
In this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548990.msg65563546#msg65563546 it is mentioned that the new version of Electrum cannot sign legacy addresses starting with 1, which is exactly my case.
What could be the solution to this issue?
You can sign an address using legacy address. You can also see that in the thread.et me quote it.In this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5548990.msg65563546#msg65563546 it is mentioned that the new version of Electrum cannot sign legacy addresses starting with 1, which is exactly my case.
What could be the solution to this issue?
Electrum can sign with legacy addresses and those signatures can be verified by other wallet software because there's a standard behind it. But when it comes to non-legacy addresses there is no standard signature format so electrum generated signatures can't be verified by other wallet software.