Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 09:10:33 AM

Quote from: dplay on Today at 08:50:29 AM

Quote from: holydarkness on July 08, 2025, 05:49:35 PM

Yes, my thought exactly: if it's about a flag for --let's say-- arbing or syndicate betting or fixed match, they'll already be very vocal about it. But they didn't mention any of provider flagging you. Thus, safe to say, not arbing or other things that come from the provider. And it'll be safe to assume fixed match is not in the book either. Hence, the question, if you perhaps have any idea of what this is about?

Do you mind to perhaps tell me the strategy you use on placing those bets? How you pick the matches? Why you choose what and when and how. Anything you can tell us about your betting preference and strategy. Like... you bet last minutes [I heard this can be an issue too] perhaps?

Ratings Place explained it in the above post much better than I could. I wasn't betting on in-play singles on Vietnamese 2nd league. I was placing multis on big leagues. If there's a way to rob a sportsbook playing like that I'd also like to know how it can be done.

And that is what I am trying to achieve here: an understanding from your POV, of what betting preference you take, so I can make a proper rebuttal and/or validate or invalidate what the casino throw. If you can help me with that, it'll be very much appreciated as it'll make what I am trying to do very much easier.

So far, we've established that arbing is not in the book. It's clearly stated on my previous post, so I am not sure why it's still being pointed out on point 4. Why does it matter when you placed a bet? Well, there was a case where a player did late-bets, namely when they know a situation would very much likely to occur. I don't remember the details of the case or what late-event was on bet, but if I may give an illustration, it might goes like: "Manchester United V. Chelsea, red card on 1st half." And you placed bet of it, seconds before well... whoever on Man Utd right now tackled someone on Chelsea that will surely grant them a red card as he's already on yellow.

So, again, if you don't mind to help me understand your betting preference so I can be in your shoes when I talk with the casino, it will be very much appreciated, as I am actively trying my best to argue your situation to the casino.

holy- they have to make an accusation, then you can answer. What is the accusation by Bet Fury? If you interrogate the OP, you are the lawyer for Bet Fury. You are making it a deposition.

If you want to put yourself in the mind of the OP, he’s thinking, what did I do wrong.