Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 3
Last scraped
Edited on 16/07/2025, 12:33:53 UTC
I can't believe this conversation is still going on.
As long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I'm beyond baffled by the attitude of this user.
I crushed the scam artists Bijan and Edward, no wonder you are baffled by my attitude.
Let us see how baffled you will be when the handcuffs click on Bijan and Edward?
He released his play logs and it was more than obvious that he didn't play the optimal strategy.
Ahh, so you claim that it is more than obvious that I didn't play the optimal strategy, but why don't you publish the proof?
He was unaware of that.
Correct, I am unaware that my optimal drawing strategy caused a 4,5% house edge, instead of the advertised 0,5%.
I even pointed out some examples but it flew right above his head.
You did not publish the proof of my drawing strategy, even though you are in the possession of it!
So you mean, you posted some examples of your hallucinated nonsense?
Blackjack is a game where if you use suboptimal strategy you rely even more on your luck and actually put your odds against you even more.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
Why don't you show the proof that my drawing strategy caused a 4,5% house edge instead of the advertised 0,5%?
Publishing hallucinated nonsense is only proof that you are mentally severly insane, but isn't proof of what you claim!
Although he disk actually have some lucky streaks too.
Proof?
Anyway, that should be the end of the discussion.
No, as long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I wonder why stake support didn't include that in their rrsponse too but perhaps they realized it's a stupid case and left it to their lowly support agents for handling instead of wasting the time of an expert.
Let me guess, the Stake Legal Department is wrong and the mentally severly insane nonsense hallucinator is right?
Oh wait, the Stake Legal Department didn't say my drawing strategy caused my experienced 4,5% house edge, because I used optimal drawing strategy!
It is your hallucinated nonsense against the Stake Legal Department declaration:
Quote from: Stake legal department
The user has reached out to the complaints department more than 30 times for the same inquiry.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
Version 2
Scraped on 09/07/2025, 13:03:42 UTC
I can't believe this conversation is still going on.
As long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I'm beyond baffled by the attitude of this user.
I crushed the scam artists Bijan and Edward, no wonder you are
He released his play logs and it was more than obvious that he didn't play the optimal strategy.
Ahh, it is more than obvious that I didn't play the optimal strategy, but why don't you publish the proof?
He was unaware of that.
Correct, I am unaware that my optimal drawing strategy caused a 4,5% house edge, instead of the advertised 0,5%.
I even pointed out some examples but it flew right above his head.
You did not publish the proof of my drawing strategy, even though you are in the possession of it!
So you mean, you posted some examples of your hallucinated nonsense?
Blackjack is a game where if you use suboptimal strategy you rely even more on your luck and actually put your odds against you even more.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
Why don't you show the proof that my drawing strategy caused a 4,5% house edge instead of the advertised 0,5%?
Publishing hallucinated nonsense is only proof that you are mentally severly insane, but isn't proof of what you claim!
Although he disk actually have some lucky streaks too.
Proof?
Anyway, that should be the end of the discussion.
No, as long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I wonder why stake support didn't include that in their rrsponse too but perhaps they realized it's a stupid case and left it to their lowly support agents for handling instead of wasting the time of an expert.
Let me guess, the Stake Legal Department is wrong and the mentally severly insane nonsense hallucinator is right?
Oh wait, the Stake Legal Department didn't say my drawing strategy caused my experienced 4,5% house edge, because I used optimal drawing strategy!
It is your hallucinated nonsense against the Stake Legal Department declaration:
Quote from: Stake legal department
The user has reached out to the complaints department more than 30 times for the same inquiry.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
Version 1
Scraped on 09/07/2025, 12:39:00 UTC
I can't believe this conversation is still going on.
As long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I'm beyond baffled by the attitude of this user.
I crushed the scam artists Bijan and Edward, no wonder you are surprised about my attitude.
He released his play logs and it was more than obvious that he didn't play the optimal strategy.
Ahh, it is more than obvious that I didn't play the optimal strategy, but why don't you publish the proof?
He was unaware of that.
Correct, I am unaware that my optimal drawing strategy caused a 5% house edge, instead of the advertised 0,5%.
I even pointed out some examples but it flew right above his head.
You did not publish the proof of my drawing strategy, even though you are in the possession of it!
So you mean, you posted some examples of your hallucinated nonsense?
Blackjack is a game where if you use suboptimal strategy you rely even more on your luck and actually put your odds against you even more.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
Why don't you show the proof that my drawing strategy caused a 4,5% house edge instead of the advertised 0,5%?
Publishing hallucinated nonsense is only proof that you are mentally severly insane, but isn't proof of what you claim!
Although he disk actually have some lucky streaks too.
Proof?
Anyway, that should be the end of the discussion.
No, as long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I wonder why stake support didn't include that in their rrsponse too but perhaps they realized it's a stupid case and left it to their lowly support agents for handling instead of wasting the time of an expert.
Oh wait, the Stake Legal Department didn't say my drawing strategy caused my experienced 4,5% house edge, because I used optimal drawing strategy!
It is your hallucinated nonsense against the Stake Legal Department:
Quote from: Stake legal department
The user has reached out to the complaints department more than 30 times for the same inquiry.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
We have provided the user with the requested information and guided them on validating the license in accordance with Antillephones' preferred procedures.
The User has also been attempting to claim that the 8048/JAZ license is invalid for cryptocurrencies.
Our system allows users to access their complete bet history from the date of registration, and there is no limit on the data storage.
All data stored under the "bet archive" and other sections of your account, are protected by our License, which we strictly adhere to.
For the Blackjack game, users can easily filter data in their bet archive spreadsheet.
Our licensing information and regulations have been transparently available on our website since Stake's inception.
Upon registration, the User acknowledges and accepts our Terms of Service which provide information the above and also provides this clearly.
Prior to using our services, it's crucial for users to comprehend the inherent risks associated with gambling, as winning cannot be guaranteed.
Regarding RTP, it's important to note that this figure is based on a calculation involving at least 1 million bets.
In short sessions with a few hundred or thousand bets, variability is expected, it is impossible to make accurate calculations based on these sessions.
Overall, the frivolous claims made by this User have been explained to them many times by Support and other members of the community:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2178857.400.
It is clear to us that there are no ground for reimbursement.
Original archived Re: ⚖️ Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All
Scraped on 09/07/2025, 12:34:13 UTC
I can't believe this conversation is still going on.
As long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I'm beyond baffled by the attitude of this user.
I crushed the scam artists Bijan and Edward, no wonder you are surprised about my attitude.
He released his play logs and it was more than obvious that he didn't play the optimal strategy.
Ahh, it is more than obvious that I didn't play the optimal strategy, but why don't you publish the proof?
He was unaware of that.
Correct, I am unaware that my optimal drawing strategy caused a 5% house edge, instead of the advertised 0,5%.
I even pointed out some examples but it flew right above his head.
You did not publish the proof of my drawing strategy, even though you are in the possession of it!
So you mean, you posted some examples of your hallucinated nonsense?
Blackjack is a game where if you use suboptimal strategy you rely even more on your luck and actually put your odds against you even more.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
So you can even raise the house edge. Exactly as blackjacky did and lost.
Why don't you show the proof that my drawing strategy caused a 4,5% house edge instead of the advertised 0,5%?
Publishing hallucinated nonsense is only proof that you are mentally severly insane, but isn't proof of what you claim!
Although he disk actually have some lucky streaks too.
Proof?
Anyway, that should be the end of the discussion.
No, as long as desperate signature spammers are desperate to place their hallucinated nonsense to get some cents, the conversation will go on!
I wonder why stake support didn't include that in their rrsponse too but perhaps they realized it's a stupid case and left it to their lowly support agents for handling instead of wasting the time of an expert.
So it is your hallucinated nonsense against the Stake Legal Department!
Let me guess, the Stake Legal Department is wrong and the mentally severly insane nonsense hallucinator is right?
Oh wait, the Stake Legal Department didn't say my drawing strategy caused my experienced 4,5% house edge, because I used optimal drawing strategy!