its crazy to be asked to prove that you are not wrong in every single aspect, rather than asking the bookie wtf is the accusation in the first place. they shouldnt be able to say `theres something wrong so we ll not pay` anymore
Let's table this for now, and I'll explain in due time. I believe... well, hope, you, as someone who have an first-hand experience of when I am bridging something [or basically everyone here who oversee cases neutrally and see me through an unbiased lens, really] knows why I ask questions.
OP,
dplay, I can see you online, again. I really appreciate if you can be more attentive to the matter and put effort to engage more with me. If I may be frank, I talk with several casinos at once on daily basis. If you just read and went sillent for whatever reason, your case can easily be pushed to the back of my mind as I communicated other things and other cases with other casinos [or perhaps even the same casino], and situation like before will happen.
To put it simply, the faster you help me understand from your POV, the faster I can be in your shoes and, once I understand the matter from both perspective, argue to the casino for you and find an outcome.
I understand you're trying to build a steelman version of both positions. But I've been fully transparent about my bets, I've posted screenshots and I'm not really quite sure how to further contribute to the discussion. If someone sees anything wrong from the bets I posted please tell. And no, I've never taken any questionable bets as that example you described. I think this is a case where I've won too much money in too short of a time period so the casino got mad.
I'm also replying to the posts whenever I see them, it's in my interest to do so. It happens that I refresh the thread but don't get around to reading the replies or replying myself as I'm doing other stuff as well.