Quote from: btc_angela on Today at 01:37:35 AM

Quote from: Israelgogo on Today at 01:01:31 AM

I have come to understand that the countries we mostly refers to as world powers or the big five like USA, Russia, China, Germany etc all deals with nuclear weapons that post treats, fears and minority orientations to other countries. Countries like Arab, Iran, Irag, Pakistan and lots more have powers but do not actually have nuclear weapons to withstand or fight the big fives countries rather it has always be a thing of negotiations for resources, boundaries and scales rather than fights and win battles to know who control the world.

Africa has millions of people but can't boast of any weapons except retires guns and stainless used and abandoned by America's and Europeans, and that's why Africa can not stand for their rights like Burkinafaso today,
You can correct me on this statements.

Of course, we have big countries > underdeveloped and 3rd world countries. That's why there are imbalances in the world. Those progressive countries have a lot of nuclear scientist and physicist that can developed more potent weapons, a weapon of mass destruction.

Hopefully though, the sitting world leader wouldn't think of using it's nuclear weapons as it could lead to a world war 3. As for the poor nations, it's going to be very hard to acquire even one of this nuclear weapons, priorities are going to be very different.

Your absolutely correct, priority places a major role when it comes to ownership of a nuclear weapon, more than half of the entire population of Africa are struggling you basic needs, and over the years most African countries have suffered the brunt of not having leaders that come in for the soul responsibility of the developing the country, so you have them spend number of years in leadership and at the end of the day they don't have any impact. So most African leaders come into office with the responsibility of at least developing the people, making them economically stable, so at what point as a leader will you have time to start prioritizing the need to have nuclear weapons, when you are faced with challenges of economic instability. Even the Burkina Faso you are giving as an example at the moment will have to take a good number of years before they can even think of having a nuclear weapon, and that is if the military regime they have now will even continue, and you know how rigorous is going it could be to start the process of nuclear weapon ownership, sometimes you even have to face some sanctions.