It seems like PSG is more dominant, the chance of PSG winning is quite big, as seen from the odds, betting on Chelsea to win has odds of 4.40 while PSG is -1.613 (1.613), but this is not a benchmark for taking big risks, I personally prefer over 2.5 or under 3.5, it is difficult to predict when a strong team is fighting
Quite an interesting shift in quotes, just recently they were like this:
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
Now in the source where I look at them they are as follows:
4.80 - 3.95 - 1.71
In fact, I am surprised because even 1.61 I considered generosity on the part of the bookmakers. I don't know what this is connected with (there is nothing in the news about one of the leading PSG players being poisoned or something like that), but usually such a sharp move on the part of bookmakers means that either they know something or fans are making a disproportionately large number of bets on the underdog.
I didn't hesitate on taking on the initiative to bet in favour of Chelsea yesterday while the odds for Chelsea was still up at odds 5.20 and it could be that many gamblers out there are also taking a shot at the high odds alloted to Chelsea in this finals. We ain't 100% sure of if PSG are going to win despite they looking as the favourite in the game tonight. So I think the bookmakers are only taking precautions by lowering the odds for Chelsea and increasing that of PSG to lure more gamblers to take interest in risking that of PSG.
It is interesting that 1-1 is quoted as only 7.70, and 0-0 as 15.00. Moreover, BTTS Yes/No is 1.71/2.16. There must be some bias here. Or maybe the bookmakers think that PSG is invulnerable and the main part of the BTTS No coefficient is that Chelsea will not score a goal.
I like Chelsea Double Chance 2.30 and goalless draw (too high odds)
That 0-0 @15 odds can't be ignored and this sounds spicy hot 🔥 especially that PSG meets a team with the park the bus blueprint, but the pressure will be too much for them to go goalless for 90 minutes and this is a lot of time, plus we have VAR that picks up on any funny infringements and possible penalties...maybe a fiver on this I like Chelsea Double Chance 2.30 and goalless draw (too high odds)
And btw PSG are not only invulnerable but they are invisible
The quotes have changed suspiciously:
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
Now in the source where I look at them they are as follows:
4.80 - 3.95 - 1.71
As we can see, PSG's odds have been reduced in favor of Chelsea's double chance. I wonder what the bookmakers know? 
I thought that with the way PSG plays, +61% for one bet is easy money, but now it's even more. Suspicious. By the way, I checked the weather (I thought maybe a thunderstorm was expected, the game would be stopped and therefore the randomness would be increased) but it seems the weather is calm and everything will go without force majeure.
Yeah, the group of death vs the easy group looked way way too different, I mean look at Chelsea's path to the final, it's laughable and looks just like original CWC whereas PSG had to fight Atletico, Bayern, Real Madrid, come on, the draw could have been better.
But the main thing is, I still think is prestige. And how you bring prestige to a circus, is to stop making it look like its run by clowns!
But the main thing is, I still think is prestige. And how you bring prestige to a circus, is to stop making it look like its run by clowns!
Nothing can compare to City getting the easiest opponents in any tournament (as long as it can)
As for the group stage of the Champions League in the new format, my thought was that there could be at least 30 teams, at least 35, or any other number now, it makes no difference since it’s just a clown show
It seems like PSG is more dominant, the chance of PSG winning is quite big, as seen from the odds, betting on Chelsea to win has odds of 4.40 while PSG is -1.613 (1.613), but this is not a benchmark for taking big risks, I personally prefer over 2.5 or under 3.5, it is difficult to predict when a strong team is fighting
Quite an interesting shift in quotes, just recently they were like this:
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
Now in the source where I look at them they are as follows:
4.80 - 3.95 - 1.71
In fact, I am surprised because even 1.61 I considered generosity on the part of the bookmakers. I don't know what this is connected with (there is nothing in the news about one of the leading PSG players being poisoned or something like that), but usually such a sharp move on the part of bookmakers means that either they know something or fans are making a disproportionately large number of bets on the underdog.
PSG currently look like the ultimate force against the whipping boys, but the odds for the final are pretty standard:
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
If PSG wins in regular time (which everyone is probably sure of) then +61% for a single bet looks like easy money, right? I can't understand what the catch is. Of course Chelsea is a qualified team, but PSG looks much stronger.
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
If PSG wins in regular time (which everyone is probably sure of) then +61% for a single bet looks like easy money, right? I can't understand what the catch is. Of course Chelsea is a qualified team, but PSG looks much stronger.
PSG to win is definitely easy money and the odds is of good value looking at where both teams currently are, I don’t find Chelsea to win @ 5.3 tempting, quite honestly, If the 5+ Odds were to be for Chelsea to win the trophy maybe I could consider it, knowing fully well that I’m more likely to lose my money.
Yes, theoretically I can believe that Chelsea will hold out until the penalty shootout and be lucky there. Bookmakers, by the way, also consider this option as probable - the chances are 1 to 3.19, which is significantly less than 5+, which would be profitable.
I guess it's time to sum it up (there's no point for me to look at both pots haha), I hope the next Club World Cup will firstly not be held in the US, since delays of games due to weather are just nonsense. And secondly, I'm not even sure that this tournament is needed, players get year-round burnout, this is not normal. So far from what I've seen, I haven't noticed any real value/emotions that the fans received. This is a weaker version of the Champions League.
I would rather look at how external (in relation to Europe) clubs get wild cards in the Champions League. For example, those that in normal time zones can do it.
PSG currently look like the ultimate force against the whipping boys, but the odds for the final are pretty standard:
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
If PSG wins in regular time (which everyone is probably sure of) then +61% for a single bet looks like easy money, right? I can't understand what the catch is. Of course Chelsea is a qualified team, but PSG looks much stronger.
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
If PSG wins in regular time (which everyone is probably sure of) then +61% for a single bet looks like easy money, right? I can't understand what the catch is. Of course Chelsea is a qualified team, but PSG looks much stronger.
PSG to win is definitely easy money and the odds is of good value looking at where both teams currently are, I don’t find Chelsea to win @ 5.3 tempting, quite honestly, If the 5+ Odds were to be for Chelsea to win the trophy maybe I could consider it, knowing fully well that I’m more likely to lose my money.
PSG currently look like the ultimate force against the whipping boys, but the odds for the final are pretty standard:
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
If PSG wins in regular time (which everyone is probably sure of) then +61% for a single bet looks like easy money, right? I can't understand what the catch is. Of course Chelsea is a qualified team, but PSG looks much stronger.
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
If PSG wins in regular time (which everyone is probably sure of) then +61% for a single bet looks like easy money, right? I can't understand what the catch is. Of course Chelsea is a qualified team, but PSG looks much stronger.
PSG to win is definitely easy money and the odds is of good value looking at where both teams currently are, I don’t find Chelsea to win @ 5.3 tempting, quite honestly, If the 5+ Odds were to be for Chelsea to win the trophy maybe I could consider it, knowing fully well that I’m more likely to lose my money.