It is interesting that 1-1 is quoted as only 7.70, and 0-0 as 15.00. Moreover, BTTS Yes/No is 1.71/2.16. There must be some bias here. Or maybe the bookmakers think that PSG is invulnerable and the main part of the BTTS No coefficient is that Chelsea will not score a goal.
I like Chelsea Double Chance 2.30 and goalless draw (too high odds)
That 0-0 @15 odds can't be ignored and this sounds spicy hot 🔥 especially that PSG meets a team with the park the bus blueprint, but the pressure will be too much for them to go goalless for 90 minutes and this is a lot of time, plus we have VAR that picks up on any funny infringements and possible penalties...maybe a fiver on this I like Chelsea Double Chance 2.30 and goalless draw (too high odds)
And btw PSG are not only invulnerable but they are invisible
Don't expect much from Chelsea, I just hope that they won't get destroyed like Real in semifinal. Maybe scoring early goal is only way how Chelsea can win this.
It is interesting that 1-1 is quoted as only 7.70, and 0-0 as 15.00. Moreover, BTTS Yes/No is 1.71/2.16. There must be some bias here. Or maybe the bookmakers think that PSG is invulnerable and the main part of the BTTS No coefficient is that Chelsea will not score a goal.
I like Chelsea Double Chance 2.30 and goalless draw (too high odds)
That 0-0 @15 odds can't be ignored and this sounds spicy hot 🔥 especially that PSG meets a team with the park the bus blueprint, but the pressure will be too much for them to go goalless for 90 minutes and this is a lot of time, plus we have VAR that picks up on any funny infringements and possible penalties...maybe a fiver on this I like Chelsea Double Chance 2.30 and goalless draw (too high odds)
And btw PSG are not only invulnerable but they are invisible
The quotes have changed suspiciously:
5.30 - 4.30 - 1.61
Now in the source where I look at them they are as follows:
4.80 - 3.95 - 1.71
As we can see, PSG's odds have been reduced in favor of Chelsea's double chance. I wonder what the bookmakers know? 
I thought that with the way PSG plays, +61% for one bet is easy money, but now it's even more. Suspicious. By the way, I checked the weather (I thought maybe a thunderstorm was expected, the game would be stopped and therefore the randomness would be increased) but it seems the weather is calm and everything will go without force majeure.
Yeah, the group of death vs the easy group looked way way too different, I mean look at Chelsea's path to the final, it's laughable and looks just like original CWC whereas PSG had to fight Atletico, Bayern, Real Madrid, come on, the draw could have been better.
But the main thing is, I still think is prestige. And how you bring prestige to a circus, is to stop making it look like its run by clowns!
But the main thing is, I still think is prestige. And how you bring prestige to a circus, is to stop making it look like its run by clowns!
Nothing can compare to City getting the easiest opponents in any tournament (as long as it can)
As for the group stage of the Champions League in the new format, my thought was that there could be at least 30 teams, at least 35, or any other number now, it makes no difference since it’s just a clown show