Do top leaders or presidents of countries or big corporations and businesses do better economically because they were brought up from a rich family background with wealthy parents or from a poor family background with poor parents?
Background of people has a big role to play in the society. doing well economically or financially is two sided, meaning that in some rich homes they have the resources to train their kids to any length. and this length will either impact them positively or negatively. if they are positive they will be useful to the society and they will do better. but if not then it becomes the opposite.
it is also possible that the poor can be good in
economicleadership role because of good upbringing and
do to good family financial
managementbackground. because they where born and brought up in a
poor environmentgood family , for this reason, they will want to
make a changemaintain their dignity, thereby keeping there heads up and do the right thing to
buildmaintain a good reputation. some family may be poor but have a good reputation and this can bring good luck. and vise versa a rich family may have a bad reputation, and will lead to bad luck. so you never can tell which among this two can be qualified in terms of leadership role.