Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 2
Last scraped
Edited on 13/07/2025, 19:47:06 UTC
I don't know where this happened, and I don't know which country you're talking about.
However, what you've said seems important enough to discuss. School should be the most comfortable place for children outside of home. Education aims to produce students who not only possess broad knowledge but also possess strong reasoning skills, creativity, and initiative. Schools should be a place for students to discover their talents. However, this will not be achieved if the quality of educational institutions and educational staff is considered poor and substandard.
And actually, there are no such things as naughty children; there are children who lack attention, both from their parents at home and from their teachers at school. They're naughty because they want attention, they want their existence to be recognized.
Homes are uncomfortable places for most people since most families are fucked up. I don't care why children are misbehaving. When they are violent, we must consider all public schools as being completely and permanently discredited. When public school students are violent, we must all consider public school graduates as stupid ass morons.However, what you've said seems important enough to discuss. School should be the most comfortable place for children outside of home. Education aims to produce students who not only possess broad knowledge but also possess strong reasoning skills, creativity, and initiative. Schools should be a place for students to discover their talents. However, this will not be achieved if the quality of educational institutions and educational staff is considered poor and substandard.
And actually, there are no such things as naughty children; there are children who lack attention, both from their parents at home and from their teachers at school. They're naughty because they want attention, they want their existence to be recognized.
Public schools are cheaper. In my country, you would have to be rich to send your children to any good private school. Except you want to arrange for homeschooling, which might require either the wife or husband to stop working. Public schools might not be the best, but that's the only option some poor or moderate families have. But the parents have the responsibility of monitoring the topics or curriculum the children are exposed to. They need to redirect these children if the schools are deviating from acceptable beliefs or ideologies.
Whatever happened to having children with enough discipline to sit down and read a fucking book? BOOKS ARE NOT THAT EXPENSIVE! IF A STUDENT READS BOOKS FOR A COUPLE HOURS A DAY, THAT STUDENT WILL GET A FAR BETTER EDUCATION BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE TO DEAL WITH FREAKS AND IDIOTS RUINING THE EDUCATION FOR EVERYONE!But if we have to consider the children of parents who are not rich enough to afford a fucking education as stupid ass morons, then so be it. I am not here to play fair when PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE FUCKING VIOLENT HELLHOLES!
Home schooling. 
Amen. Kids need to learn how to shut up and read. Education should not even be expensive because a kid can buy a cheap laptop for 1 day minimum wage labor and a more decent laptop for 3 days minimum wage labor. Paper is cheap. Pens are cheap. Handmedown books are cheap. Sure. A bare bones cheap education won't have everything, but it will have enough. The idea that people must go to public school if they can't go to a private school is a complete and total fallacy. Oh. And about social skills. Kids won't learn any social skills by going to a fucked up environment known as a public school. They will only learn to be as fucked up as their peers.The only problem with homeschooling is that parents are usually too fucking stupid or lazy to choose good curricula for their children and to make sure they are actually learning shit. Parents don't know algebra, chemistry, physics, foreign languages. But there are solutions to this too. One solution is to have two parents in a household. The reason for this is that one parent may know a foreign language while another parent may be good at chemistry, math, and have mechanical skills. But for this to work, the kids need discipline.
Maybe you need to look at our current leaders today and see how they have all been doing well, also take a look at the society and see how we are blessed with diverse numbers of talented professionals in their various specializations, could you believe that almost 90% of them are government schools attendees and ha e passed through the same path to become whom they were today, i will only suggest my opinion that the leaders should create more budgets for the soft runnings of the educational sectors.
The leaders don't know how to lead.Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
Version 1
Scraped on 13/07/2025, 19:22:15 UTC
I don't know where this happened, and I don't know which country you're talking about.
However, what you've said seems important enough to discuss. School should be the most comfortable place for children outside of home. Education aims to produce students who not only possess broad knowledge but also possess strong reasoning skills, creativity, and initiative. Schools should be a place for students to discover their talents. However, this will not be achieved if the quality of educational institutions and educational staff is considered poor and substandard.
And actually, there are no such things as naughty children; there are children who lack attention, both from their parents at home and from their teachers at school. They're naughty because they want attention, they want their existence to be recognized.
Homes are uncomfortable places for most people since most families are fucked up. I don't care why children are misbehaving. When they are violent, we must consider all public schools as being completely and permanently discredited. When public school students are violent, we must all consider public school graduates as stupid ass morons.However, what you've said seems important enough to discuss. School should be the most comfortable place for children outside of home. Education aims to produce students who not only possess broad knowledge but also possess strong reasoning skills, creativity, and initiative. Schools should be a place for students to discover their talents. However, this will not be achieved if the quality of educational institutions and educational staff is considered poor and substandard.
And actually, there are no such things as naughty children; there are children who lack attention, both from their parents at home and from their teachers at school. They're naughty because they want attention, they want their existence to be recognized.
Public schools are cheaper. In my country, you would have to be rich to send your children to any good private school. Except you want to arrange for homeschooling, which might require either the wife or husband to stop working. Public schools might not be the best, but that's the only option some poor or moderate families have. But the parents have the responsibility of monitoring the topics or curriculum the children are exposed to. They need to redirect these children if the schools are deviating from acceptable beliefs or ideologies.
Whatever happened to having children with enough discipline to sit down and read a fucking book? BOOKS ARE NOT THAT EXPENSIVE! IF A STUDENT READS BOOKS FOR A COUPLE HOURS A DAY, THAT STUDENT WILL GET A FAR BETTER EDUCATION BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE TO DEAL WITH FREAKS AND IDIOTS RUINING THE EDUCATION FOR EVERYONE!But if we have to consider the children of parents who are not rich enough to afford a fucking education as stupid ass morons, then so be it. I am not here to play fair when PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE FUCKING VIOLENT HELLHOLES!
Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
Original archived Re: Parents who send their kids to public schools are child abusers.
Scraped on 13/07/2025, 19:17:33 UTC
I don't know where this happened, and I don't know which country you're talking about.
However, what you've said seems important enough to discuss. School should be the most comfortable place for children outside of home. Education aims to produce students who not only possess broad knowledge but also possess strong reasoning skills, creativity, and initiative. Schools should be a place for students to discover their talents. However, this will not be achieved if the quality of educational institutions and educational staff is considered poor and substandard.
And actually, there are no such things as naughty children; there are children who lack attention, both from their parents at home and from their teachers at school. They're naughty because they want attention, they want their existence to be recognized.
Homes are uncomfortable places for most people since most families are fucked up. I don't care why children are misbehaving. When they are violent, we must consider all public schools as being completely and permanently discredited. When public school students are violent, we must all consider public school graduates as stupid ass morons.However, what you've said seems important enough to discuss. School should be the most comfortable place for children outside of home. Education aims to produce students who not only possess broad knowledge but also possess strong reasoning skills, creativity, and initiative. Schools should be a place for students to discover their talents. However, this will not be achieved if the quality of educational institutions and educational staff is considered poor and substandard.
And actually, there are no such things as naughty children; there are children who lack attention, both from their parents at home and from their teachers at school. They're naughty because they want attention, they want their existence to be recognized.
Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.