Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 09:01:33 AM

Quote from: ShuffleTim on Today at 04:33:29 AM

It's quite obvious that this user's KYC does not belong to this person.

Also note we have matched the exact same IP address used across accounts. We have also tracked this user on-chain, interacting multiple Shuffle account wallets.

https://metasleuth.io/result/bsc/0xBa30fa259F4B226AF84Cc86b273556D08f6Ee1E0?source=26066313-9718-4395-abf8-cd13ef280ee2

Tim, with all due respect, I believe there are already some people trying to reach you and suggest you to get in touch with me, and this is me directly requesting your kind permission to establish a direct contact. Please shoot me a PM with your telegram username if you wish me to reach you personally and wouldn't mind to allow me to see and validate those findings [as we don't have an ADR that can validate that fake-KYC and multi-acc counter accusation]. I'm offering myself, if you would.

OP, Jadens55, this is what I am talking about when I say I am working with a colleague of mine as well as the CM of this casino to solve this matter: to validate or invalidate the counter-accusation of multi-account and fake KYC. Suppose both parties agree for me to see and validate them.

You have my permission for whatever you need. I don't want my personal details to be leaked publicly, but as long as it's between you and/or some trusted forum members, I am fine with that. This is why I offered my account access, if needed.