Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Edited on 14/07/2025, 18:44:18 UTC
Wait... umm... I don't think I understand this.
Rating Place, I am asking your permission to share with public what you inform me through PM regarding this case. That's one of the reason why I didn't chase the casino firther [aside from the stance I had as poured in older post, as well as the player himself didn't give their consent to me, so I can't speak on their behalf] and "ignored" OP's consecutive post of being "ignored" by the casino. And then you... not only encouraged a flag, but also going to supporting it?
What happened?
You can share if you want. I’m not going to say what they told me. Let’s just say we didn’t see eye to eye. Rating Place, I am asking your permission to share with public what you inform me through PM regarding this case. That's one of the reason why I didn't chase the casino firther [aside from the stance I had as poured in older post, as well as the player himself didn't give their consent to me, so I can't speak on their behalf] and "ignored" OP's consecutive post of being "ignored" by the casino. And then you... not only encouraged a flag, but also going to supporting it?
What happened?
By your permission:
This is the reason why I barely try to bridge this case [again, aside from above mentioned reason] and other XYes related matters. Because Rating Place assured me that he's in contact with XYes.
I have to say that I am very surprised with this turn of event. From "I can help do that case" to "where do I go to support the flag?" and this come from someone who state to me,
I did these arbitration cases a lot longer than you. The casino makes an allegation with proof. Then the player replies to discredit that proof.
And instead of arbitraging between players and the casino, like you said you'll do, you encouraged a flag? Because "we didn't see eye to eye"?
I dont mean to be rude or attacking you, but at the very least, especially as you claimed to have been arbitrating cases longer than me, you'll at least have an uderstanding when you've exhausted a path, you try to exhaust another, intead of suddenly encouraging a flag because "we didn't see eye to eye". Even if that means telling me that it doesn't go well between you and XYes so I can at least take it back.
If you can share what "we didn't see eye to eye" exactly is, that might be a good start to help us understand this sudden mess. Because if I were in that position, I'll exhaust every other possible way, and ask OP to allow me to speak on their behalf and fight for their case with XYes instead of just encourage a flagging.
God of Thunder, can you please give insight on what happened? Were you still in contact with them following my last talk with them [I believe I update you with this] where I withdraw myself as per a situation I understood that there is someone else who will talk with them for their player's behalf?
You are always looking for trouble and get all twisted up when I reply. It's more important to you to try and make me look bad then helping players. It's not going to work. Doing double blind studies was your best when all you had to do is ask why they didn't pay.
Original archived Re: XYES STEAL $1811.75
Scraped on 14/07/2025, 18:14:31 UTC
Wait... umm... I don't think I understand this.
Rating Place, I am asking your permission to share with public what you inform me through PM regarding this case. That's one of the reason why I didn't chase the casino firther [aside from the stance I had as poured in older post, as well as the player himself didn't give their consent to me, so I can't speak on their behalf] and "ignored" OP's consecutive post of being "ignored" by the casino. And then you... not only encouraged a flag, but also going to supporting it?
What happened?
You can share if you want. I’m not going to say what they told me. Let’s just say we didn’t see eye to eye. Rating Place, I am asking your permission to share with public what you inform me through PM regarding this case. That's one of the reason why I didn't chase the casino firther [aside from the stance I had as poured in older post, as well as the player himself didn't give their consent to me, so I can't speak on their behalf] and "ignored" OP's consecutive post of being "ignored" by the casino. And then you... not only encouraged a flag, but also going to supporting it?
What happened?
By your permission:
This is the reason why I barely try to bridge this case [again, aside from above mentioned reason] and other XYes related matters. Because Rating Place assured me that he's in contact with XYes.
I have to say that I am very surprised with this turn of event. From "I can help do that case" to "where do I go to support the flag?" and this come from someone who state to me,
I did these arbitration cases a lot longer than you. The casino makes an allegation with proof. Then the player replies to discredit that proof.
And instead of arbitraging between players and the casino, like you said you'll do, you encouraged a flag? Because "we didn't see eye to eye"?
I dont mean to be rude or attacking you, but at the very least, especially as you claimed to have been arbitrating cases longer than me, you'll at least have an uderstanding when you've exhausted a path, you try to exhaust another, intead of suddenly encouraging a flag because "we didn't see eye to eye". Even if that means telling me that it doesn't go well between you and XYes so I can at least take it back.
If you can share what "we didn't see eye to eye" exactly is, that might be a good start to help us understand this sudden mess. Because if I were in that position, I'll exhaust every other possible way, and ask OP to allow me to speak on their behalf and fight for their case with XYes instead of just encourage a flagging.
God of Thunder, can you please give insight on what happened? Were you still in contact with them following my last talk with them [I believe I update you with this] where I withdraw myself as per a situation I understood that there is someone else who will talk with them for their player's behalf?