Quote from: LEVSKI7 on Today at 06:48:04 PM

Quote from: Riceandbean on Today at 05:38:15 PM

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 04:48:28 PM

Quote from: daniebanker on Today at 03:40:23 PM

Quote from: Rating Place on Today at 03:34:53 PM

OP if you create a flag, using the example by nutildah, it will really hurt them big since it'll be highlighted in their ANN thread. It could force their hand.

I think i already did.
Could you tell me if i did well?

Ah, indeed you did, and yes, you chose the most lenient type of flag, which is a good choice. I have supported flag.

Moving away from the allegation of arbitrage betting, "value betting" in itself shouldn't be a reason to confiscate winnings. Ideally, a sportsbook makes money from the spread in odds, meaning that if they have enough bettors on both sides of a bet, they will profit regardless of the outcome of the game/match. Perhaps because they are a relatively new book, they don't have enough action for this to happen. But that's hardly your fault.

As has been said a few times already, the appropriate thing to do (if they wanted to discourage value betting while maintaining the integrity of their book) would be to pay out the winnings and then limit the amount you can bet next time, or even ban your account from making future bets. The winnings are relatively small, so the fact that they aren't paying them out isn't very confidence-inspiring.

You are right, but I have a question, why don't players choose a casino that allows VALUE BETTING to arbitrage? I know that several casinos allow it. Isn't all this avoidable? Because I think xyes will not return the money to this user.

This is not a concert of wills/ numerous court decisions show that the bookmaker cannot impose personal limits and close the account. This was also stated by some regulators. Now a similar discussion is taking place in the USA and all limited accounts are being checked.

They cam all limit. Pinnacle, Bitcoin-Betting, Circa and Bookmaker are the only ones U know that don’t limit.