Peeps, I literally withdraw myself from XYes following your PM. And you still accuse me of "you are still backing the casino"? I literally remove myself completely and only return when this shit hits the ceiling.

You want to prove yourself by declaring you've been arbitrating cases a lot longer than me. I choose to give you that and withdraw myself from XYes cases, and next thing I heard is you encouraged this case to raise a flag, asked where can you support the flag, and the casino didn't meet you eye to eye?

What meet eye to eye is this, exactly? Kinda interesting to know, as well as efforts you exhausted to "arbitrating" this case, because it seems, if I may interpret the timeline correctly, you're reaching the casino, in touch with them, talking about something [I don't know how far and about what, since you refuse to talk about it], didn't meet eye to eye, and they withdraw themselves from the forum [they remove their business relation with GoT before this whole flag happen] just like... three days after they're in touch with you. And then you encouraged a flag.

Such a turn of event, no? From being able to help with the case to encouraging a flag. Why is that, if I may ask? Hopefully that's not to discredit them further and preemptively taint their reputation and make anything that come later from them rather dubious, suppose they returned to explain to the public why they withdraw as well as what "didn't meet eye to eye" this is?

Oh, if you want to make a rebuttal by saying all of the above is me attacking you, let me preemptively answer that: it's not. It's asking for clarification of what happened.

You can add that to point 6 with the other 5 that you also refuse to answer. It'll just add... molehill to your credibility.

Peeps, I literally withdraw myself from XYes following your PM. And you still accuse me of "you are still backing the casino"? I literally remove myself completely and only return when this shit hits the ceiling.

You want to prove yourself by declaring you've been arbitrating cases a lot longer than me. I choose to give you that and withdraw myself from XYes cases, and next thing I heard is you encouraged this case to raise a flag, asked where can you support the flag, and the casino didn't meet you eye to eye?

What meet eye to eye is this, exactly? Kinda interesting to know, as well as efforts you exhausted to "arbitrating" this case, because it seems, if I may interpret the timeline correctly, you're reaching the casino, in touch with them, talking about something [I don't know how far and about what, since you refuse to talk about it], didn't meet eye to eye, and they withdraw themselves from the forum [they remove their business relation with GoT before this whole flag happen] just like... three days after they're in touch with you. And then you encouraged a flag.

Such a turn of event, no? From being able to help with the case to encouraging a flag. Why is that, if I may ask? Hopefully that's not to discredit them further and preemptively taint their reputation and make anything that come later from them rather dubious, suppose they returned to explain to the public why they withdraw as well as what "didn't meet eye to eye" this is?

Oh, if you want to make a rebuttal by saying all of the above is me attacking you, let me preemptively answer that: it's not. It's asking for clarification of what happened.

You can add that to point 6 with the other 5 that you also refuse to answer. It'll just add... molehill to your credibility.