Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 15/07/2025, 11:46:48 UTC
In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?
I don't see why I would want to lose money on purpose by betting on a team I know for sure would lose just to simply stir things up a bit or so, money is not easy to come by and I wouldn't waste it like that.
but if the other team has at least a little of a chance, would you not take it?

if the other team is coming in as a favorite but then the opponent does not lag too much behind then maybe it would be even fun to go for the underdog and if you win you will earn more
[quuote]
Quote
First, let me say that I don't know what your definition for "dominant" is because as far as I know, in sports, we can't say that a team or club is dominantly winning matches if they manage to win 5 to 6 matches in a row, and this is because such result is easy to achieve, alot of teams and clubs easily do this, so for me personally to consider a team or club as a dominant winner, they have to have won 10 to 15 matches or more in a row and still counting, such is hard to find if we must be sincere with ourselves..
[/quote]
to me if a team is always winning in a league

winning back to back championships etc that is quite dominant
Original archived Re: Dominant forces in the sport
Scraped on 15/07/2025, 11:42:11 UTC
In sports, there is always someone winning dominantly. It can get to a point where they are almost always expected to win. By that point do you continue to bet on those favorites to keep winning or does it bore you? Would you enjoy stirring it up a bit just for the fun of it and betting on the underdogs even if the chances are quite low?
I don't see why I would want to lose money on purpose by betting on a team I know for sure would lose just to simply stir things up a bit or so, money is not easy to come by and I wouldn't waste it like that.
but if the other team has at least a little of a chance, would you not take it?

if the other team is coming in as a favorite but then the opponent does not lag too much behind then maybe it would be even fun to go for the underdog and if you win you will earn more
[quuote]
First, let me say that I don't know what your definition for "dominant" is because as far as I know, in sports, we can't say that a team or club is dominantly winning matches if they manage to win 5 to 6 matches in a row, and this is because such result is easy to achieve, alot of teams and clubs easily do this, so for me personally to consider a team or club as a dominant winner, they have to have won 10 to 15 matches or more in a row and still counting, such is hard to find if we must be sincere with ourselves..
[/quote]
to me if a team is always winning in a league

winning back to back championships etc that is quite dominant