Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 2
Last scraped
Edited on 16/07/2025, 12:14:17 UTC
But here's what keeps me curious: @teguh54321 just posted actual hash distribution data showing 44% variance between ranges (104 vs 72 hits). That's not imagination - that's measurable deviation from uniform distribution.
Those are local variations which completely average out over bigger samples.
Source : I ran statistics on more than 2^67 hashes for puzzles 67 and 68. They even out pretty well
Yeah you sadly right 😅🙃.
But there still might... i say might...
But it hard to discover cause it appear random
Version 1
Scraped on 16/07/2025, 11:49:02 UTC
But here's what keeps me curious: @teguh54321 just posted actual hash distribution data showing 44% variance between ranges (104 vs 72 hits). That's not imagination - that's measurable deviation from uniform distribution.
Those are local variations which completely average out over bigger samples.
Source : I ran statistics on more than 2^67 hashes for puzzles 67 and 68. They even out pretty well
Yeah you sadly right 😅🙃.
But there still might... i say might... small noise that we can take advantage of ..
But it hard to discover cause it appear random
Original archived Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Scraped on 16/07/2025, 11:44:27 UTC
But here's what keeps me curious: @teguh54321 just posted actual hash distribution data showing 44% variance between ranges (104 vs 72 hits). That's not imagination - that's measurable deviation from uniform distribution.
Those are local variations which completely average out over bigger samples.
Source : I ran statistics on more than 2^67 hashes for puzzles 67 and 68. They even out pretty well
Yeah you sadly right 😅🙃