Quote from: Beparanf on Today at 09:09:07 AM

Quote from: tauyiu on July 18, 2025, 04:11:23 PM

Quote from: Beparanf on July 18, 2025, 03:44:22 PM

This is issue is due to their games design that can be exploit through the method that you use. You didn’t violate their game rules however I don’t know if they have terms which they are allowed to forfeit profit if they think the method is unfair which some casino included on their ToS.

But at least you should be compensated if they can’t pay you in full for finding this loophole on their game.

Hi Beparanf, I totally agree with your point where the issue is with the game design. I have gone through and read their TOS, the only thing that is applicable to this case is the part where “irregular play includes, but is not limited to...”, meaning they can just cough up any reason to suspend my account. While I believe I am entitled to the full amount, I’m open to discussing a fair settlement if BK8 steps up and communicates transparently.

I speculate that they will stick to their decision since they are protected with their ToS with that vague clause. It’s an insurance of the casino in case there’s something wrong on their game design.

You win a huge amount out of small deposits. I’m skeptical if you will get full payment or even half of it.

You need to provide a detailed evidence of your method so that user here can fully understand the nature of your strategy.

Many casinos do keep vague clauses in their Terms as a safety net, but I believe it’s important to draw a line between using it for genuine protection versus using it after the fact to justify not paying out a legitimate win. In this case, BK8 offered a game based on real-time market data, and any market will naturally go through periods of low volatility, where price movements are minimal. I simply placed bets based on the information made available by their system.

Regarding how the game works and my strategy:
The game provides a 10-second window to place bets, followed by 10 seconds to determine the “Close” value, which reflects the market’s closing price within that round. The last digit of the second decimal place of the “Close” value determines the winning number (i.e., 0 to 9). So if the “Close” is 100,000.02, then “2” wins.

I focused on two observable factors from the live feed of the game:
1) Volume – When the reported trading volume is low (around 0–5 units), it often indicates very little market activity, meaning price movement is limited.
2) Close movement pattern – During these low-volatility periods, the “Close” price tends to hover between fixed values like 100,000.01 and 100,000.02, or even stay unchanged.

When I observed this, I would bet on the two likely outcomes (in this case, digits “1” and “2”) — this isn’t manipulation or abuse. It’s pattern recognition based on available, real-time data.

In my opinion, this isn’t exploiting a flaw. It’s simply smart betting based on predictable behavior in low-volatility markets, something BK8 should have considered when designing the game or hosting the game.

Do let me know if you need further explanation on this to clear things up.