It should have happened earlier, if cricket had been in the Olympics like football, then the number of cricket teams would have increased a lot. Now, there are probably 8 to 10 teams that play regular cricket, but when Olympic cricket is included, different countries of the world will participate there and those who do well will have the possibility of participating in tournaments like the World Cup. Since this is being done for the second time, we will expect it to happen every time and we can see new teams every season. The biggest reason for this is that football has many more teams participating and most of the countries compete hard and then qualify for the main stage of the World Cup. The same thing happens in cricket, that is, if every team has to qualify for the main stage of the World Cup through tough competition, then cricket will also become more popular.
Perhaps this year's edition has the potential to continue the tradition of the past as we can see that the return of cricket to the Olympics will create a great opportunity for the cricket boards. Obviously it can be said that if cricket, like football, had been included in the Olympics, it would have had a strong potential for growth.We are completely surprised to hear that cricket is getting a chance here again after 128 years, so perhaps Cricket's periodic attraction would have improved more if the game of cricket had been given regular opportunities in these few years. So I think that the return of cricket to the Olympics will transform it into a tough competition, just like football and
at this stage it
doesn't make sense to me to automatically select a fewseems that teams
for this festive Olympicsmay be given a chance through the qualifying round.