Quote from: examplens on July 18, 2025, 09:52:55 AM

You can't get a concrete answer to this because it all depends on which AML check method a service uses.
Here are some examples. Two different exchanges recognized the same funds differently. One found an 80%+ risk score, while the other had no problem because the risk score was below 30%. (checked one of my addresses)
Next, many instant exchangers use an AML check by Whitebit, which necessarily marks all coins and transactions related to eXch as high risk. For example, Binance did not cause a problem with coins related to eXch.

So, AML crap has become quite individual; you just have to pay attention to which service you use and where you send your coins.

Here is an example of a response I received from an exchange after they stopped my order.

Quote

The digital asset for which you submitted an order to sell was acquired by a hacker attack on the Bybit stock exchange in February 2025. You are not a direct acquirer, two intermediate transactions passed from the theft of the digital asset to your acquisition (so we are sure that you are not familiar with the origin), but we are unable to accept your transaction for the reasons stated.

Well, I faced the same issue with the WhiteBit exchange. I send an Alt coin that I wanted to cash out and they requested to verify (?) both the sender's address and the recipient's address (the one I used to withdraw after the sale). I sent them an instant message to find out the reason for this, and they told me that they need to know for our protection...🙄🥱
By the way, is it possible to tell us what happened after you got this reply from them? I mean, do you get your coins back? Did they blacklisted you? Did they let you continue without a problem?