This depends entirely on the needs, lifestyle and taste of each person. In that case, it will be seen that many people prefer city life, while many people prefer to live or build a house in the village or the place where they spent their childhood. However, according to the need, you should first understand which benefits are available where, for example: - People in the city are more assured of global connectivity, ease of technology, economic security, career growth, better education, medical facilities than in the village.

On the other hand - in the environment of rural life, there's safe shelter for the future in old age, peace of mind, peaceful life in close proximity to nature and the cost of living in the village is lower than in the city. There are also some disadvantages. For example : limited employment and modern facilities, lack of long-term economic prospects. Medical, educational and emergency service facilities have become less than necessary in some villages or rural areas.
safe shelter for the future (in old age), peace of mind, peaceful life in close proximity to nature and the cost of living in the village is lower than in the city. There are also some disadvantages. For example : limited employment and modern facilities, lack of long-term economic prospects. Medical, educational and emergency service facilities have become less than necessary in some villages or rural areas.

The problem is not only in the villages, there are many types of problems in the cities as well, such as: lack of time, mechanical lifestyle, lack of natural environment, low stability of life, mental stress, being away from family, all of these are closely related to the people of the cities.

Eventually, in the cities we have to work to earn a living, but in the villages we have roots and our birth-identity, honor and dignity are intertwined with it. For my position in life and future security, prudent investment in both areas is essential. If you get one, you understand the lack of the other, if you get both, you don't understand the lack of either. There are two things needed in life, so it is wise to gradually improve both areas as needed.

This depends entirely on the needs, lifestyle and taste of each person. In that case, it will be seen that many people prefer city life, while many people prefer to live or build a house in the village or the place where they spent their childhood. However, according to the need, you should first understand which benefits are available where, for example: - People in the city are more assured of global connectivity, ease of technology, economic security, career growth, better education, medical facilities than in the village.

On the other hand - in the environment of rural life, there's
safe shelter for the future (in old age), peace of mind, peaceful life in close proximity to nature and the cost of living in the village is lower than in the city. There are also some disadvantages. For example : limited employment and modern facilities, lack of long-term economic prospects. Medical, educational and emergency service facilities have become less than necessary in some villages or rural areas.

The problem is not only in the villages, there are many types of problems in the cities as well, such as: lack of time, mechanical lifestyle, lack of natural environment, low stability of life, mental stress, being away from family, all of these are closely related to the people of the cities.

Eventually, in the cities we have to work to earn a living, but in the villages we have roots and our birth-identity, honor and dignity are intertwined with it. For my position in life and future security, prudent investment in both areas is essential. If you get one, you understand the lack of the other, if you get both, you don't understand the lack of either. There are two things needed in life, so it is wise to gradually improve both areas as needed.