I don't think this is the right way to make this comparison and what wealth distribution is and how it flows from one individual to the other as far as gambling is concerned, for sure we need to make something very clear here, and that is gambling is never a means of wealth distributions so we shouldn't view it to be because of the high risk involved in gambling, and gambling financial flow goes from the casino to the players,and from the players to the casino, so that is what works and nothing like wealthy gambler and poor gambler distributing movement.
ResGambling is a place where the house profits greatly, and the player suffers significant losses. This differs from the distribution of wealth, as in trade transactions, where wealth is transferred from one individual to another. In gambling, the distribution of money from one player to another is irrelevant and should be considered a distribution of wealth. Essentially, each player only gets back the money they lose when they gamble. Only one or two people withdraw more than they deposit, so gambling or casinos cannot create a chain of wealth distribution. That's my personal opinion, and of course, everyone's opinion may differ. -CMIIW