Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Next scheduled rescrape ... in 19 hours
Version 2
Last scraped
Scraped on 20/07/2025, 14:49:33 UTC
Quote from: _act_ on July 20, 2025, 01:39:47 PM
Quote from: Satofan44 on July 20, 2025, 12:20:06 PM
Quote from: pooya87 on July 20, 2025, 03:32:20 AM
I voted no because I see it as a pointless warning because that's not how Bitcoin security should be viewed.
Incorrect approach to security by you. Address re-use was always warned against by anyone who approached security correctly.
You are very wrong. Address reuse is advised for privacy so far quantum computers are not yet a threat. It is quantum computers that will later let it be of security concern. Your manner of approach is disgusting by correcting someone that is right and saying directly that the person is wrong when you are the one that is very wrong.
Nope, you know very little about Bitcoin. Don't respond to my posts, get back to signature farming in other sections.

Quote from: _act_ on July 20, 2025, 01:39:47 PM
This is absolutely false information from you Satofan44. Please do not post incorrect information to mislead people. I hope you have changed from giving people negative feedback because you think they are wrong, just because their posts is against yours.
Negative tagged for posting false information and trolling. You can derive a private key from any public key, it will just take a very long time  Smiley. It is called computationally infeasible, not mathematically impossible not that. Anyhow a person like you wouldwon't know what these words mean anyway.  Roll Eyes Kid just shut up already and let the grown ups talk. Next time ask ChatGPT for help as your brain is just a vacuum of space.
Version 1
Scraped on 20/07/2025, 14:24:48 UTC
Quote from: _act_ on July 20, 2025, 01:39:47 PM
Quote from: Satofan44 on July 20, 2025, 12:20:06 PM
Quote from: pooya87 on July 20, 2025, 03:32:20 AM
I voted no because I see it as a pointless warning because that's not how Bitcoin security should be viewed.
Incorrect approach to security by you. Address re-use was always warned against by anyone who approached security correctly.
You are very wrong. Address reuse is advised for privacy so far quantum computers are not yet a threat. It is quantum computers that will later let it be of security concern. Your manner of approach is disgusting by correcting someone that is right and saying directly that the person is wrong when you are the one that is very wrong.
Nope, you are a signature farming idiot that knowsknow very little about Bitcoin. Don't respond to my posts, get back to signature farming in other sections.

Quote from: _act_ on July 20, 2025, 01:39:47 PM
This is absolutely false information from you Satofan44. Please do not post incorrect information to mislead people. I hope you have changed from giving people negative feedback because you think they are wrong, just because their posts is against yours.
Negative tagged for posting false information and trolling. You can derive a private key from any public key, it will just take a very long time  Smiley. JustIt is called computationally infeasible, not mathematically impossible not that you would know what these words mean anyway.  Roll Eyes Kid just shut up already kid and let the grown ups talk. Next time ask ChatGPT for help as your brain is just a vacuum of space.
Original archived Re: Should wallets warn if you re-use addresses due to quantum computers?
Scraped on 20/07/2025, 14:20:00 UTC
Quote from: _act_ on July 20, 2025, 01:39:47 PM
Quote from: Satofan44 on July 20, 2025, 12:20:06 PM
Quote from: pooya87 on July 20, 2025, 03:32:20 AM
I voted no because I see it as a pointless warning because that's not how Bitcoin security should be viewed.
Incorrect approach to security by you. Address re-use was always warned against by anyone who approached security correctly.
You are very wrong. Address reuse is advised for privacy so far quantum computers are not yet a threat. It is quantum computers that will later let it be of security concern. Your manner of approach is disgusting by correcting someone that is right and saying directly that the person is wrong when you are the one that is very wrong.
Nope, you are a signature farming idiot that knows very little about Bitcoin.

Quote from: _act_ on July 20, 2025, 01:39:47 PM
This is absolutely false information from you Satofan44. Please do not post incorrect information to mislead people. I hope you have changed from giving people negative feedback because you think they are wrong, just because their posts is against yours.
Negative tagged for posting false information and trolling. You can derive a private key from any public key, it will just take a very long time  Smiley. Just shut up already kid and let the grown ups talk.