[edited out]
I don't agree with your definition of aggressive buying, the part of your discretionary income whether it is the maximum part or the minimum part you chooses to invest with is your own level of aggressiveness, it is not a measure of how large you are investing but a measure of how much you can comfortably use to buy Bitcoin because that is what your risk level can carry, buying Bitcoin with the maximum amount of your discretionary income doesn't make anyone a Smart investor, it is ideally that you invest according to your own risk tolerance level investment goals and objectives and this will be differs by different investors and you are not proven yourself to anybody it is individual race and on your own lane that is not a competition.
You seem to be bringing a sense of competition into your assessment of what a guy might choose to invest aggressively or not, Stormisover.
If we are talking about a choice that a guy can make in regards to how much of his discretionary income he dedicates to investing into bitcoin, then he makes such a choice about how much he would like to prioritize bitcoin over other ways that he could choose to spend his discretionary income.
He could invest up to 100% of his discretionary income into bitcoin, and likely anything above 70% or 80% could probably be characterized as aggressive. The guy can choose to be aggressive or not. I frequently suggest that guys should attempt to be as aggressive as they are able to in regards to bitcoin investment without over doing it, yet that still leaves them with the choice in regards to how much they believe is "as aggressive as they can be." If they have a spouse or girlfriend that requires them to go out to eat once a week no matter what, then their spending money to be able to go out every week might not be something that they are able to cut in order to achieve other things that they would like to achieve in life. If they have a child that they promised to buy a bicycle or some other kind of an expensive item, and they have to save several months to buy that bicycle, then they might not be able to cut that expense from their budget in order to buy more bitcoin. They also might not feel comfortable to invest any more than 80% of their discretionary income into bitcoin every week, so no matter what the maximum that they are going to spend on bitcoin is 80% of their discretionary income.
If they usually buy something like $100 per week of bitcoin, yet one month they suddenly receive a work bonus of $2k, they realize that they have right around 20weeks of their DCA that they are able to invest in bitcoin, and they think about if they should invest any using 1) DCA, 2) buying right away and/or 3) buying on dip. They consider all three categories for that extra money, and they try to figure out how aggressive they want to be with those extra funds.
There need not be any implication that a guy is competing with anyone, even if he might be trying to invest into bitcoin as aggressively as he can without overdoing it.. and he is trying to figure out and to measure how aggressive he is able to be with the tools of looking at his discretionary income...and of course, considering other aspects of his cashflows and his cashflow management systems that may well include the various back up funds that he has in place.