Quote from: ruykeri on Today at 01:22:27 PM

Quote from: Barikui1 on Today at 07:01:41 AM

Quote from: Muba20 on Today at 04:53:25 AM

Quote from: Nightwatchmare on July 21, 2025, 04:37:14 PM

Quote from: sotelorene on July 18, 2025, 04:47:07 PM

Yes, I totally agree with you agreessive investment should not be done often because there is every possibility that you will run out of funds and once an Investor run out of funds it is going to be a very big problem. The only thing that should be carry out or done regularly or often is our DCA method while agreessive investment should be done once in awhile when we have saved up something big that will help us take advantage of the market. Anyone investor who doesn't understand this word investing agreessive might exceed their limit and one thing about investment is that once you exceed what you are suppose to..., you will see the consequences but a good investor can reduce the consequences by taking necessary actions.

Since we are using discretionary income to accumulate bitcoin, there's no problem if an investor decides to invest aggressively in bitcoin all the time because he is using the money that is not meant for his expenses to invest in bitcoin, and he can use his discretionary income the way that pleases him. Investing aggressively in bitcoin has been discussed so many times on this thread and on the buy the dip and hodl thread, but it seems a lot of members are still misunderstanding the concept of investing aggressively in bitcoin. Investing aggressively in Bitcoin isn't only when you use $200 or $500 to accumulate Bitcoin; as far as you are consistent in accumulating Bitcoin weekly or monthly with $5, you are investing aggressively in Bitcoin because that is your level of aggressiveness, and you aren't also overdoing it.

Many people don't understand aggressive investing. They may think that pouring in more money means aggressive investing, which in reality is not the case. But the reality is that an investor can be aggressive by controlling his risk, that means, if he invests all his discretionary income, it is an aggressive investment, but it is not risky. As a result, the investor will be able to grow his Bitcoin portfolio. There are some investors who wait for the dip as a strategy. If they do not do that, but use their discretionary income money regularly over the long term, then he will be able to build a good portfolio. If the investor invests more than he can afford, it will certainly be acceptable ‍and he will definitely be able to acquire a large portfolio of Bitcoin in the future.

Investing aggressively in Bitcoin isn't that bad if you are doing it within your discretionary income, what's bad there is that some Investors tends to invest in Bitcoin aggressively and get carried away by start investing with money that is meant for their upkeeps, that is where it's wrong, if you are investing aggressively within the range of your discretionary income and your emergency and reserve funds are in place you have nothing to worry about because it's the right thing you are doing especially if you are still lagging behind in your accumulation journey, so in essence of what am trying to say is that accumulating Bitcoin aggressively is not a terrible idea if you are doing it the right way, where the problem are is when you are investing more than the discretionary income you have, that's where the problem is.

I agree with you because if someone invests all of their discretionary income in Bitcoin regularly, then it can be called aggressive investment by definition, but according to the person who is actually investing , it may not be feel like him as aggressiveness . People think that investing aggressively in Bitcoin is very risky, but the main theory here is that the investment is made from discretionary income. If there is any income outside of those expenses of a person then it is called discretionary income. Another thing to know is that if he saves some money in every month as a savings ,reserve fund and other. After this kind of spending money in every month, then the remaining part after deducting all these expenses is understood as a discretionary income . He can do whatever he wants with the money outside of this daily life spending money , and it won't be a problem for him to live on.

If anyone invest 100% of his discretionary income in bitcoin it wont be risky for him because this money is separate from his daily expenses like savings , reserve fund and emergency fund also. But if he puts all of his total wealth into one specific business then it could be very dangerous for him because he is investing all of his income and assets in one place.
Now the question may arise what is the probability of profit or loss in Bitcoin? If you look at the statistics of the last 10 years, you will get a clear idea about this. if you are basically invest for a long time, regularly, that could be more than 10 years by using DCA method . it will be way better than any other investing. The longer you invest, the more likely you are to make a profit. Now Bitcoin has reached a point where it is that the price of Bitcoin may not huge drop in the future. In my thinking bitcoin price will not be under $100,000 in future . Now is the time to think like this “I intend to invest in Bitcoin for the next 10 years using the DCM method. I should think about how much more times profit I will get compared to total investing after 10 years''.

You are actually right, when you are confuse aggressively investing with reckless behavior, but when it’s done when using only discretionary income money that’s truly “extra” after all essentials, savings, and reserves then the risk is rightly much more controlled than it looks
Using the DCA strategy for long-term Bitcoin invest,
it makes a lot of sense too. History stipulated that time in the market often beats timing the market, especially with assets like Bitcoin. As long as the fundamentals stay strong and someone’s not risking money they can’t afford to lose, the long game could be really profitable