Quote from: teguh54321 on Today at 01:48:21 PM

Quote from: hoanghuy2912 on Today at 12:12:33 PM

Quote from: teguh54321 on Today at 01:49:11 AM

Quote from: hoanghuy2912 on July 21, 2025, 06:25:32 PM

Quote from: teguh54321 on July 21, 2025, 04:32:31 PM

Do anyone here believe the whole puzzle use the same seed ?
Is there posibility that that same seed lead to some similar statistical behaviour among them ?
Just asking , mybe somone deeply observe it ? 😅🙏

https://ibb.co/DDQtZnwf
like this

Image not available 😅🤔

Quote from: Cricktor on July 21, 2025, 11:18:29 PM

Quote from: QG623 on July 21, 2025, 10:39:01 PM

So they generated private keys using a simple k = k + 1 scheme.

You don't understand how key derivation in BIP32 works and your foolish assumptions that puzzle keys have any dependency from one to another is deeply flawed.

Even though key derivation in deterministic wallets is deterministic, it doesn't mean that you can calculate a sequential key solely from knowledge of its predecessor or successor (or any other key).

In a deterministic wallet all keys appear as if they're random. Period! There is no exploitable relation between individual keys. Masking them down to a certain bitlength doesn't introduce any new relation.

But you can happily continue to read tea leaves...

I dont say any direct connection or dependency between them.
I mean some kind of statistical prefix frequency similiarity among huge keyspace around them maybe 😅. I just persue to look it deeper. As i scan lots of statistical bias in several prefix count / frequency in dissected private key keyspace result

Click on the link to see the photo

Image not found. Can you re upload ?

https://i.ibb.co/Rpc9qWQT/Screenshot-2025-07-22-012321.png